EPoX nForce4 DDR2: MF4 Ultra-3, MF4 Ultra-3/G, AF4 Ultra-3, AF4 Ultra
Performance Results
| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 24.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 5.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5.5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 5 years ago.
| System | NVIDIA AWRDACPI |
| Motherboard | EPoX nForce4 DDR2: MF4 Ultra-3, MF4 Ultra-3/G, AF4 Ultra-3, AF4 Ultra (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.7 GB free of 5.5 GB @ 0 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20060823 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 02 '18 at 05:00 |
| Run Duration | 112 Seconds |
| Run User | RUS-User |
| Background CPU | 24% |
PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Processor
Socket M2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
|
41.2%
Average
|
41% 62 Pts
|
10% 75.8 Pts
|
5% 85.3 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 580-$450
MSI(1462 2550) 1.5GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1024 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 391.1
|
24.9%
Poor
|
24% 35.3 fps
|
27% 33.4 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD WD2000JS-00MHB0 200GB
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01C03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
28.7%
Poor
|
35% 47.1 MB/s
|
32% 0.29 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 5GB
null MHz
2048, 2048, 1024, 512 MB
|
13.9%
Very poor
|
12% 4.1 GB/s
|
10% 3.63 GB/s
|
39% 102 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds