Medion Erazer X7842 MD99690

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	23.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Medion Erazer X7842 MD99690 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION P670RE1M
Memory	3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20151105
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 02 '18 at 17:38
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Memory 82.6 1-Core 89.1 2-Core 175 68% 116 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 476 51% 407 Pts	64-Core 476 29% 476 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970M 21,995 User benchmarks, average bench 31% Clevo(1558 6780) 3GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	23.3% Poor	Lighting 26 Reflection 29.8 Parallax 26.6 21% 27.5 fps	MRender 35.3 Gravity 35.3 Splatting 31.1 28% 33.9 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLF128HCHP-000 128GB 66 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 41GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXT2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 10490 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1507 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 84 84 333 (AE) Unknown 99 99 205 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1068 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 61 39 39 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 83 83 13983808 (F1) Unknown 99 99 17304 (F2) Unknown 99 99 26409 (F9) Unknown 99 99 42656	53% Above average	Read 493 Write 134 Mixed 212 61% 280 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 43 4K Mixed 11 70% 25.4 MB/s	DQ Read 173 DQ Write 41.8 DQ Mixed 29.4 42% 81.3 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 53%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 369GB free Firmware: AM0P Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1275 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1884 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 75 75 10393 (0A) Spinup retry count 137 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1504 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 79 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 73 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 80 80 208525 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 206159282206 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 92 92 3531 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 172 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	60.3% Good	Read 106 Write 105 Mixed 99.7 78% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.67 4K Mixed 0.2 72% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA451S6AFR8N-TF 1315 CT4G4SFS8213.C8FBD2 8GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2133, 2133 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	65.5% Good	MC Read 25.7 MC Write 25.3 MC Mixed 19.8 67% 23.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 21.2 SC Mixed 18.7 50% 17.5 GB/s	Latency 75.8 53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 70%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Erazer X7842 MD99690 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Medion Erazer X7842 MD99690

CPU
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	11x

GPU
GTX 970MNvidiaBench 31%, 21,995 samples	7x
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	4x

SSD
MZNLF128HCHP-00000 128GBSamsungBench 47%, 6,038 samples	5x
MZNLN256HCHP-00000 256GBSamsungBench 79%, 3,145 samples	2x
Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBWDBench 217%, 23,579 samples	2x

RAM
HMA451S6AFR8N-TF 1x4GBHynixBench 36%, 9,725 samples	5x
HyperX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GBKingstonBench 77%, 2,917 samples	3x
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 55,289 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16