Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics56.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 09 '18 at 00:44
Run Duration447 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 88.5
1-Core 75.9
2-Core 145
63% 103 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 461
44% 366 Pts
64-Core 450
28% 450 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.3.4
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Lighting 71.9
Reflection 69.6
Parallax 83.9
59% 75.1 fps
MRender 70.7
Gravity 68.4
Splatting 57.9
53% 65.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ ARC 100 480GB-$70
230GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 422
Write 432
Mixed 417
95% 424 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 53.9
4K Mixed 28
96% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 74.4
72% 116 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 101%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
308GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 90.3
Write 81.7
Mixed 84
64% 85.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.99
4K Mixed 0.34
91% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 54%
Intenso Rainbow Line 8GB
4GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
3.23% Terrible
Read 13.1
Write 2.45
Mixed 3.16
6% 6.23 MB/s
4K Read 3.36
4K Write 0.003
4K Mixed 0.002
13% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.23%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C11 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.2% Average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 17.3
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 12.8
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 69
58% 69 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback