Hp-pavilion WC979AA-UUZ HPE-121ch

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	34.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hp-pavilion WC979AA-UUZ HPE-121ch (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI IONA
Memory	3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100128
Uptime	11.9 Days
Run Date	Apr 23 '18 at 17:45
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	Memory 94 1-Core 81.1 2-Core 148 66% 108 Pts	4-Core 259 8-Core 367 39% 313 Pts	64-Core 371 23% 371 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% MSI(1462 3201) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	34.6% Below average	Lighting 45.4 Reflection 42.3 Parallax 37.8 37% 41.8 fps	MRender 38 Gravity 38.3 Splatting 34.3 30% 36.9 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 240GB-$70 27,495 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: 580A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 42083354 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 86096914418473 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1487 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 35 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 28 42 85902098460 (C2) HDA temperature 28 42 85902098460 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 42083354 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 42083354 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 42083354 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 99 99 1 (E9) Unknown 0 0 6739 (EA) Unknown 0 0 6137 (F1) Unknown 0 0 6137 (F2) Unknown 0 0 12802	45.4% Average	Read 262 Write 211 Mixed 207 50% 227 MB/s	4K Read 15.6 4K Write 29.6 4K Mixed 10.5 53% 18.6 MB/s	DQ Read 181 DQ Write 111 DQ Mixed 78.1 76% 123 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 45.4% Great: 94%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$64 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 211GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 110 108 7491 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5205 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 7204 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3902 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 71 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 152 152 144090 (C2) HDA temperature 117 99 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 8 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 5 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 198 10	54.2% Above average	Read 98.9 Write 90 Mixed 93.6 71% 94.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.43 4K Write 1.49 4K Mixed 0.27 76% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 57%
Seagate FreeAgentDesktop 250GB 638 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 162GB free, PID 3000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Read 27.4 Write 22.6 Mixed 20.7 29% 23.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 0.94 4K Mixed 0.35 46% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 9905403-046.A00LF 9801 9905403-046.A00LF 9801 9905403-069.A00LF 9801 9905403-046.A00LF 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	41.7% Average	MC Read 15.4 MC Write 13.4 MC Mixed 13.2 40% 14 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 12 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 59.9 67% 59.9 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Hp-pavilion WC979AA-UUZ HPE-121ch

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)