Dell PowerVault 500

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell PowerVault 500  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0M332H
Memory18.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101030
Uptime5 Days
Run DateJun 25 '18 at 20:42
Run Duration104 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon 5130
CPU1, 2 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
36.5% Below average
Memory 60.1
1-Core 21.6
2-Core 43
30% 41.6 Pts
4-Core 77.7
8-Core 77.7
10% 77.7 Pts
64-Core 53
3% 53 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 41%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Storage Space Device 11TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.9% Average
Read 337
Write 440
Mixed 509
97% 428 MB/s
4K Read 0.18
4K Write 8.86
4K Mixed 0.83
6% 3.29 MB/s
DQ Read 20.2
DQ Write 17.4
DQ Mixed 1.28
6% 12.9 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 87%
Dell PERC 5/i 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
97.4% Outstanding
Read 173
Write 167
Mixed 144
121% 161 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.21
69% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M395T5160FB4-CE68 80CE7FB380AD HYMP151F72CP4D3-S5 80CE7FB380AD HYMP151F72CP4D3-S5 80CE7FB380AD HYMP151F72CP4D3-S5 80CE7FB380CE M395T5160QZ4-CE68 80CE7FB380CE M395T5160FB4-CE68 80CE7FB380AD HYMP151F72CP4D3-S5 80CE7FB380CE M395T5... 32GB
667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.2
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 4.4
14% 4.77 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 3.3
9% 3.17 GB/s
Latency 127
31% 127 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback