Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UP5 TH-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z77X-UP5 TH-CF  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140515
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJun 29 '18 at 03:53
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Memory 87.4
1-Core 103
2-Core 188
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 514
51% 419 Pts
64-Core 512
32% 512 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan Black-$1,000
EVGA(3842 3791) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
53.9% Above average
Lighting 66.7
Reflection 65.5
Parallax 89.2
54% 73.8 fps
MRender 78.7
Gravity 72.8
Splatting 49.4
53% 67 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 4 512GB-$349
345GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 398 414 413 409 408 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 438
Write 416
Mixed 261
SusWrite 405
85% 380 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 78.2
4K Mixed 31.4
119% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 27.1
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 31
34% 54.3 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 108%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
100GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 98 104 102 105 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 96.5
Write 79.3
Mixed 84.3
SusWrite 102
67% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57%
Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 114 117 119 117 118 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 105
Write 95.7
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 117
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
112% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 83%
ORICO H/ W RAID0 12TB
11TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 15 16 16 15 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 31.8
Write 14
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 14.7
25% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
66% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.8% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 15.3
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 15.4
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z77X-UP5 TH-CF Builds (Compare 171 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UP5 TH-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $593
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback