Asus N73JG

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	18.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus N73JG (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK N73JG
Memory	4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100903
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 09 '18 at 02:55
Run Duration	207 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	68%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 460-$130 18,336 User benchmarks, average bench 40% Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	39.7% Below average	Memory 64.3 1-Core 56.4 2-Core 81.9 44% 67.5 Pts	4-Core 96.1 8-Core 61.8 11% 78.9 Pts	64-Core 135 8% 135 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 47%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 1562) 3.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2361 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.66% Terrible	Lighting 0.7 Reflection 1.88 Parallax 0.69 1% 1.09 fps	MRender 1.1 Gravity 0.53 Splatting 1.35 1% 0.99 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.66% Great: 1%
Nvidia GeForce GT 415M 85 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 1562) 1GB CLim: 500 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	1.4% Terrible	Lighting 1.67 Reflection 1.92 Parallax 0.44 1% 1.34 fps	MRender 2.24 Gravity 1.57 Splatting 1.7 2% 1.83 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.4% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT08B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 23 21 22 22 38 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	18.4% Very poor	Read 130 Write 17.5 Mixed 42.4 SusWrite 25 12% 53.7 MB/s	4K Read 11 4K Write 8.2 4K Mixed 6.5 29% 8.57 MB/s	DQ Read 108 DQ Write 25.6 DQ Mixed 32.5 33% 55.2 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 73%
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB 31,052 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 59GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 173 172 127 64 68 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	41.9% Average	Read 197 Write 184 Mixed 161 SusWrite 129 38% 168 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 25.4 4K Mixed 21.1 67% 21.3 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 113 DQ Mixed 116 87% 115 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 123%
LaCie Rugged FW USB3 500GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1GB free, PID 104b Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 23.5 Write 20.7 Mixed 17.5 26% 20.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.5 45% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 40%
Seagate BUP Slim RD 2TB 279 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 3GB free, PID ab24 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 16 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Read 21.3 Write 20.8 Mixed 19 SusWrite 16.4 26% 19.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 55%
LaCie Rikiki USB 3.0 1TB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 2GB free, PID 106a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 17 16 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	12.9% Very poor	Read 25.7 Write 21.5 Mixed 19.7 SusWrite 16.4 27% 20.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 86% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.9% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT51264BF160B.C16F 2x4GB 4,853 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	21% Poor	MC Read 5.9 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 9 20% 7.1 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 5.7 14% 5 GB/s	Latency 116 35% 116 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 21% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N73JG Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Asus N73JG

CPU
Core i5 M 460Intel $130Bench 40%, 18,336 samples	6x
Core i5 M 480IntelBench 41%, 16,023 samples	2x
Core i7 M 640IntelBench 43%, 5,045 samples	2x

GPU
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	9x
GeForce GT 415MNvidiaBench 1%, 85 samples	2x

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $49Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x
SUV500240G 240GBKingstonBench 75%, 13,649 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5273EH1-CF8 2x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 8 samples	4x
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 2x2GBHynixBench 33%, 8,194 samples	3x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 24%, 13,596 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $179

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16