PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 48.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 80.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus STRIX H270F GAMING (all builds) |
Memory | 11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180511 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jul 14 '18 at 17:11 |
Run Duration | 188 Seconds |
Run User | DNK-User |
Background CPU | 13% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
|
42.7%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 8618) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.46
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
48.7%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 256 279 273 278 283 MB/s
|
80.2%
Excellent
|
|||
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
109GB free
Firmware: 2.11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 87 96 88 93 95 MB/s
|
43%
Average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 152 156 160 158 155 MB/s
|
87.7%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 104 105 109 107 80 MB/s
|
59.1%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
496GB free
Firmware: HP23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 97 100 95 100 101 MB/s
|
57.1%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
49.8%
Average
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-7700KIntel $230Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 472x |
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 422x |
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 189x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 204x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 194x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 151x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 85% - Excellent | Total price: $739 |