Shuttle SZ68R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive70.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemShuttle SZ68R  (all builds)
MotherboardShuttle FZ68
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120904
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 15 '18 at 17:53
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 80.6
2-Core 158
64% 107 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 410
42% 337 Pts
64-Core 446
28% 446 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740
EVGA(3842 2744) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 344.75
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
6.75% Terrible
Lighting 8.2
Reflection 8.15
Parallax 8.72
7% 8.36 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 8.5
Splatting 9.96
7% 8.15 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.75%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
255GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 349 290 310 294 293 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 418
Write 73.5
Mixed 117
SusWrite 309
51% 229 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 47
4K Mixed 20.3
84% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 24
71% 152 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 99%
Crucial M550 512GB-$283
249GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 276 232 227 213 213 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 394
Write 371
Mixed 289
SusWrite 235
72% 322 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 57.3
4K Mixed 28.1
103% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 228
189% 267 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 111%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
442GB free
Firmware: EXT4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 213 209 208 229 233 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64.2% Good
Read 231
Write 233
Mixed 210
SusWrite 214
50% 222 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 33.3
105% 34.6 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 184
142% 194 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 126%
ASMT 2105 10TB
1TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 19 20 20 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 30
Write 25.3
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 19.1
32% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 1.3
194% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 90%
ASMT 2105 2TB
708GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 29
Write 23.5
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 18.6
31% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.6% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 14.7
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 14.2
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SZ68R Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski

System: Shuttle SZ68R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $519
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback