Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive81% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140106
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateJul 18 '18 at 01:06
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
63.2% Good
Memory 77.6
1-Core 74.8
2-Core 142
59% 98.1 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 461
44% 362 Pts
64-Core 457
28% 457 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 156
Parallax 147
101% 142 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 140
Splatting 114
101% 124 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 512GB-$150
260GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 250 264 281 288 289 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 361
Write 306
Mixed 308
SusWrite 268
70% 311 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 58
4K Mixed 39
128% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 226
170% 229 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 81%
Great: 133%
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139
119GB free
Firmware: X2316RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 372 377 390 395 396 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 462
Write 369
Mixed 185
SusWrite 379
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 61.5
4K Mixed 28.8
109% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 259
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 119
119% 192 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 85%
Great: 99%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 959GB
378GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 368 257 131 71 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
69% Good
Read 476
Write 405
Mixed 124
SusWrite 206
67% 303 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 36.9
4K Mixed 28.9
95% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 245
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 104
96% 150 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 69%
Great: 103%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 114 114 110 114 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 124
Write 134
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 113
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 83%
Verbatim Store n Go V3 USB 3.0 8GB-$7
2GB free, PID 0243
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 5.6 8.9 9.4 9.4 6.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
7.39% Terrible
Read 30.2
Write 6.7
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 7.3
12% 11.7 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 2 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.39%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.2% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 12.8
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 12.1
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 85.1
47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,065 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $606
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback