Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	42.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180419
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Jul 22 '18 at 08:26
Run Duration	246 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$235 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	82.9% Excellent	Memory 78.9 1-Core 115 2-Core 232 79% 142 Pts	4-Core 466 8-Core 878 80% 672 Pts	64-Core 1,280 79% 1,280 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Sapphire(174B 3001) CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1525 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.7.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	42.9% Average	Lighting 56.1 Reflection 37.5 Parallax 69.7 46% 54.5 fps	MRender 34.8 Gravity 54.7 Splatting 46.3 37% 45.2 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZHPV256HDGL-000H1 256GB 58 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 95GB free (System drive) Firmware: BXW24H0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1146 1068 1050 1004 938 916 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 93%
Crucial M4 128GB-$116 34,516 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 32GB free Firmware: 000F SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 61 67 52 45 45 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	61.4% Good	Read 466 Write 192 Mixed 243 SusWrite 68.1 53% 242 MB/s	4K Read 28.8 4K Write 94.7 4K Mixed 15.9 114% 46.5 MB/s	DQ Read 138 DQ Write 120 DQ Mixed 30.2 50% 95.9 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 72%
WD FILEIO 8TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 4TB free Firmware: 4.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 86 92 91 92 91 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 27% Great: 45%
SanDisk Cruzer 8GB 5,405 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 3GB free, PID 5530 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 4.3 4.2 4.3 4.2 4 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Read 23 Write 11.3 Mixed 9 SusWrite 4.4 14% 11.9 MB/s	4K Read 6.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 2.5 181% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 13%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 256GB 550 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 2GB free, PID a840 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 43 24 17 11 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	27.8% Poor	Read 140 Write 28.1 Mixed 6.7 SusWrite 25.1 47% 50 MB/s	4K Read 8.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 1.2 73% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 36%
WD My Passport 2TB 10,723 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 201GB free, PID 0748 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 71 70 71 69 74 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	31.1% Below average	Read 66.8 Write 67.3 Mixed 42.3 SusWrite 71.1 84% 61.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 90% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 44%
SanDisk Ultra 124GB 3,905 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 12GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 5.7 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Read 31.5 Write 16.5 Mixed 17.7 SusWrite 16.6 26% 20.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 2.1 141% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 36%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB 23,482 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 4GB free, PID 5575 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 4.1 4.2 4.2 4.1 4.2 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	8.09% Terrible	Read 15.8 Write 14 Mixed 11.7 SusWrite 4.4 15% 11.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 2 126% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.09% Great: 19%
Monster OD3.0 MINI SSD 253GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 104GB free, PID 5000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 30 30 30 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	15.5% Very poor	Read 38 Write 36.1 Mixed 17.2 SusWrite 29.3 40% 30.2 MB/s	4K Read 6.2 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1.1 84% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial Ballistix Sport LT DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GB-$25 20,263 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 2866 MHz clocked @ 1433 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	54.2% Above average	MC Read 20 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 16.9 52% 18.3 GB/s	SC Read 18.9 SC Write 20.8 SC Mixed 19.2 56% 19.6 GB/s	Latency 82.6 48% 82.6 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 54.2% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,541 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	421x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	205x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	218x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	124x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $647

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)