Acer Aspire TC-710

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	55.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Acer Aspire TC-710 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Aspire TC-710
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151231
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 26 '18 at 06:39
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$76 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	74.7% Very good	Memory 81.2 1-Core 97.8 2-Core 197 72% 125 Pts	4-Core 396 8-Core 384 52% 390 Pts	64-Core 382 24% 382 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Asus(1043 85ED) 3GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	55.5% Above average	Lighting 69 Reflection 66.4 Parallax 57.3 56% 64.3 fps	MRender 69.2 Gravity 64.2 Splatting 65 54% 66.1 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 107 113 128 125 124 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	69.7% Good	Read 128 Write 130 Mixed 75 SusWrite 115 82% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 84%
USB 2.0 Flash Drive 4GB 165 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 0GB free, PID 0000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.9 4.7 4.9 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	6.07% Terrible	Read 20.5 Write 4.8 Mixed 2.5 SusWrite 4.9 8% 8.18 MB/s	4K Read 8.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 32% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 6.07% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR16D3LU1KNG/8G 1x8GB 2,154 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	31.9% Below average	MC Read 11 MC Write 11 MC Mixed 9.5 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 8.2 SC Write 9.7 SC Mixed 9.6 26% 9.17 GB/s	Latency 78.4 51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire TC-710 Builds (Compare 428 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-710

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $76Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	348x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	67x
Core i3-6100Intel $66Bench 55%, 110,166 samples	6x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	113x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	47x
GeForce GT 720NvidiaBench 4%, 15,510 samples	33x

SSD
CV1-8B128 128GBLiteonBench 69%, 9,472 samples	21x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	12x
MX500 500GBCrucial $44Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	10x

RAM
HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 29%, 9,029 samples	84x
ACR16D3LU1KNG/8G 2x8GBKingstonBench 53%, 1,171 samples	80x
ACR16D3LU1KNG/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 29%, 2,154 samples	39x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $76

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16