CrucialCT250MX500SSD1
  

Release date ≈ Q4 2019.

Controller: Silicon Motion SM2258. Flash Memory: Micron 3D TLC. Release date: Q4 2017.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 77,225 user samples
48 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 83% 119GB free
Worst Bench: 34% 82GB free (System drive)
Poor: 34% Great: 83%
SPEED RANK: 809th / 1074
77,177 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 123% 74GB free
Worst Bench: 73% 64GB free (System drive)
Poor: 73% Great: 123%
SPEED RANK: 254th / 1074
Effective Speed
Effective SSD Speed
59.4 % 101 % Much faster effective speed.
+70%
Read
Avg. Sequential Read Speed
428 MB/s 451 MB/s Slightly faster read speed.
+5%
Write
Avg. Sequential Write Speed
356 MB/s 394 MB/s Faster write speed.
+11%
4K Read
Avg. 4K Random Read Speed
20.5 MB/s 33.7 MB/s Much faster random read.
+64%
4K Write
Avg. 4K Random Write Speed
57.1 MB/s 83.4 MB/s Much faster random write.
+46%
Mixed
Avg. Sequential Mixed IO Speed
262 MB/s 386 MB/s Much faster mixed IO speed.
+47%
4K Mixed
Avg. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
14.8 MB/s 45.4 MB/s Hugely faster random mixed IO.
+207%
SusWrite
Avg. Sustained Write Speed
169 MB/s 352 MB/s Hugely faster sustained write speed.
+108%
Read
Peak Sequential Read Speed
517 MB/s +1% 514 MB/s
Write
Peak Sequential Write Speed
412 MB/s 466 MB/s Faster peak write speed.
+13%
4K Read
Peak 4K Random Read Speed
75.5 MB/s Much faster peak random read.
+77%
42.6 MB/s
4K Write
Peak 4K Random Write Speed
116 MB/s 116 MB/s
Mixed
Peak Sequential Mixed IO Speed
393 MB/s 450 MB/s Faster peak mixed IO speed.
+15%
4K Mixed
Peak 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
29.9 MB/s 58.3 MB/s Hugely faster peak random mixed IO.
+95%
SusWrite
Peak Sequential Sustained Write 60s Average
412 MB/s 458 MB/s Faster peak sustained write speed.
+11%
Market Share
Based on 76,040,243 SSDs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0 % 0.1 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
50 % 61 % More popular.
+22%
Age
Newest
55+ Months More recent.
+29%
77 Months
DQ Read
Peak 4K-64Thread Read Speed
236 MB/s 384 MB/s Much faster peak deep queue read.
+63%
DQ Write
Peak 4K-64Thread Write Speed
335 MB/s 359 MB/s Slightly faster peak deep queue write.
+7%
AS-SSD Total
AS-SSD Total Score
1,070 Pts 1,258 Pts Stronger server IO.
+18%
DQ Mixed
Peak 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
40.5 MB/s 278 MB/s Hugely faster peak deep queue mixed IO.
+586%
ADQ Read
Avg. 4K-64Thread Read Speed
141 MB/s 329 MB/s Hugely faster deep queue read.
+133%
ADQ Write
Avg. 4K-64Thread Write Speed
251 MB/s 294 MB/s Faster deep queue write.
+17%
ADQ Mixed
Avg. 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
20.8 MB/s 219 MB/s Hugely faster deep queue mixed IO.
+953%
Capacity
Capacity
128GB 250GB
ADVERTISEMENT

The MX500 is Crucial’s current flagship consumer SATA SSD featuring their latest second generation 64-layer 3D TLC NAND. It’s available in 250 GB, 500 GB, 1 TB and 2 TB capacities in a 2.5-inch form factor. All but the 2 TB version will also be available in M.2 (2280) form in the future. The MX500 features a Silicon Motion SM2258 controller which is a change from the Marvell 88SS1074 controller featured in the MX300 (it’s nearly two year old predecessor). Performance is around 30% better than on the MX300 which currently retails at the same price. The MX500 has an SLC cache which increases with drive capacity. Consequently, the larger capacities are better able to sustain high sequential write speeds. The 250 GB version has 250MB of SLC cache, the 500 GB has 512 MB, the 1 TB has 1 GB and the 2 TB has 2 GB. Extended sustained write performance tests show that even though speed does drop off after the cache has been exhausted, it is still maintained at very respectable levels. The MX500’s five year warranty is in line with Samsung’s 850 Evo and exceeds it in terms of endurance (just 75 TBW for the 250 GB 850 Evo versus 100 TBW for the 250 GB MX500). It doesn’t quite match up to the Samsung’s 850 Evo’s performance (effective speed 8% slower), however at current prices it is about 20% cheaper, and on balance offers better value for money. [Mar '18 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

Solid State Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 SSD Rankings

Welcome to our 2.5" and M.2 SSD comparison. We calculate effective speed for both SATA and NVMe drives based on real world performance then adjust by current prices per GB to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top SSDs. [SSDrivePro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your SSD? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback