Today's hottest deals
AdataASP900S3-128GM-C
SamsungMZ-7PD128BW

Controller: LSI SandForce SF2281. NAND Flash: Intel Micron Synchronous 25nm MLC. Release date: Q1 2012.

Controller: Samsung 3-core MDX. Flash Memory: Samsung 21nm Toggle Mode MLC. Release date: Q4 2012.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 37,662 user samples
2,820 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 80% 50GB free
Worst Bench: 57% 13GB free (System drive)
Poor: 57% Great: 80%
SPEED RANK: 697th / 1080
34,842 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 110% 62GB free
Worst Bench: 62% 119GB free
Poor: 62% Great: 110%
SPEED RANK: 344th / 1080
Effective Speed
Effective SSD Speed
68.6 % 89.5 % Much faster effective speed.
+31%
Read
Avg. Sequential Read Speed
380 MB/s 444 MB/s Faster read speed.
+17%
Write
Avg. Sequential Write Speed
146 MB/s 336 MB/s Hugely faster write speed.
+130%
4K Read
Avg. 4K Random Read Speed
27.5 MB/s 30.5 MB/s Faster random read.
+11%
4K Write
Avg. 4K Random Write Speed
81.6 MB/s 81.6 MB/s
Mixed
Avg. Sequential Mixed IO Speed
190 MB/s 268 MB/s Much faster mixed IO speed.
+41%
4K Mixed
Avg. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
33.6 MB/s 35.9 MB/s Slightly faster random mixed IO.
+7%
SusWrite
Avg. Sustained Write Speed
121 MB/s 286 MB/s Hugely faster sustained write speed.
+136%
Read
Peak Sequential Read Speed
428 MB/s 497 MB/s Faster peak read speed.
+16%
Write
Peak Sequential Write Speed
168 MB/s 445 MB/s Hugely faster peak write speed.
+165%
4K Read
Peak 4K Random Read Speed
32 MB/s 36.3 MB/s Faster peak random read.
+13%
4K Write
Peak 4K Random Write Speed
116 MB/s +3% 113 MB/s
Mixed
Peak Sequential Mixed IO Speed
216 MB/s 331 MB/s Much faster peak mixed IO speed.
+53%
4K Mixed
Peak 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
41.1 MB/s 44.1 MB/s Slightly faster peak random mixed IO.
+7%
SusWrite
Peak Sequential Sustained Write 60s Average
148 MB/s 440 MB/s Hugely faster peak sustained write speed.
+197%
Market Share
Based on 77,577,061 SSDs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.01 % 0.06 % Hugely higher market share.
+500%
Value
Value For Money
10.7 % Hugely better value.
+106%
5.17 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
51 % 54 % Slightly more popular.
+6%
Price
Price (score)
$40 Much cheaper.
+73%
$150
Age
Newest
152 Months 145 Months +5%
DQ Read
Peak 4K-64Thread Read Speed
199 MB/s 376 MB/s Hugely faster peak deep queue read.
+89%
DQ Write
Peak 4K-64Thread Write Speed
166 MB/s 330 MB/s Hugely faster peak deep queue write.
+99%
AS-SSD Total
AS-SSD Total Score
712 Pts 1,196 Pts Much stronger server IO.
+68%
DQ Mixed
Peak 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
171 MB/s Faster peak deep queue mixed IO.
+10%
155 MB/s
ADQ Read
Avg. 4K-64Thread Read Speed
160 MB/s 332 MB/s Hugely faster deep queue read.
+108%
ADQ Write
Avg. 4K-64Thread Write Speed
143 MB/s 245 MB/s Much faster deep queue write.
+71%
ADQ Mixed
Avg. 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
125 MB/s 126 MB/s +1%
Capacity
Capacity
128GB 128GB

The 128GB Adata Premier Pro SP900 has peak and average sequential read/write speeds of 496/166 and 175/106 MB/s. The average speeds are significantly worse than peak which indicates that the SP900 has an unstable performance profile. Additionally, the peak write speed of 166 MB/s is 90% below the group leaders. In terms of small file 4K read/write speeds things are a little better where the SP900 achieved peak and average scores of 23/83 and 17/29 MB/s. These 4K figures still lag the group leaders by around 40%. The Overall effective speed for the SP900 measures 340 MB/s, the worst I have seen to date on a 128GB SSD. The SP900 is not particularly well priced, and therefore represents poor value for money. There are both faster and cheaper 128GB alternatives available amongst the group leaders[Feb '14 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

The 128GB 840 Pro is a rock solid performer. On release, nearly a year and a half ago, the Pro smashed several speed records. Today, with sequential read/write speeds of 519/438 MBps, the Pro is still one of the fastest SSDs available. One of the Pro's top competitors is Samsungs own, newer 840 Evo. Looking at a raw synthetic speed comparison of the 128GB Pro and Evo is a little misleading. On the face of it the Pro only has a marginal lead over the Evo. This due to the fact that the Evo can only maintain its burst write speed for transfers of up to 3GB, the size of its SLC cache. The Pro on the other hand can sustain higher throughputs indefinitely. The Pro also utilizes MLC which is rated for far more erase cycles than the TLC used in the Evo. Server IO is often continuous and would quickly exhaust the 3GB cache on the Evo but for typical consumer use the Evo will remain within the SLC cache most of the time. [Feb '14 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

Solid State Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 SSD Rankings

Welcome to our SSD comparison. We calculate effective speed for both SATA and NVMe drives based on real world performance then adjust by current prices per GB to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top SSDs. [SSDrivePro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your SSD? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback