Today's hottest deals
CrucialCT250BX100SSD1
CrucialCT275MX300SSD1

Controller: Silicon Motion SM2246EN. Flash Memory: Micron 16nm MLC. Release date: Q1 2015.

Controller: Marvell 88SS1074. Flash Memory: Micron 3D TLC. Release date: Q2 2016.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 110,471 user samples
42,930 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 103% 139GB free (System drive)
Worst Bench: 59% 134GB free (System drive)
Poor: 59% Great: 103%
SPEED RANK: 384th / 1080
67,541 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 95% 67GB free
Worst Bench: 53% 38GB free (System drive)
Poor: 53% Great: 95%
SPEED RANK: 500th / 1080
Effective Speed
Effective SSD Speed
86.6 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+9%
79.4 %
Read
Avg. Sequential Read Speed
475 MB/s Slightly faster read speed.
+10%
433 MB/s
Write
Avg. Sequential Write Speed
349 MB/s 380 MB/s Slightly faster write speed.
+9%
4K Read
Avg. 4K Random Read Speed
26.2 MB/s Slightly faster random read.
+8%
24.2 MB/s
4K Write
Avg. 4K Random Write Speed
76.9 MB/s 84.7 MB/s Faster random write.
+10%
Mixed
Avg. Sequential Mixed IO Speed
284 MB/s 339 MB/s Faster mixed IO speed.
+19%
4K Mixed
Avg. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
35.8 MB/s Slightly faster random mixed IO.
+6%
33.9 MB/s
SusWrite
Avg. Sustained Write Speed
278 MB/s Faster sustained write speed.
+28%
217 MB/s
Read
Peak Sequential Read Speed
514 MB/s Slightly faster peak read speed.
+9%
472 MB/s
Write
Peak Sequential Write Speed
370 MB/s 478 MB/s Faster peak write speed.
+29%
4K Read
Peak 4K Random Read Speed
30.3 MB/s Slightly faster peak random read.
+7%
28.2 MB/s
4K Write
Peak 4K Random Write Speed
110 MB/s 117 MB/s Slightly faster peak random write.
+6%
Mixed
Peak Sequential Mixed IO Speed
338 MB/s 402 MB/s Faster peak mixed IO speed.
+19%
4K Mixed
Peak 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
44.1 MB/s Slightly faster peak random mixed IO.
+7%
41.4 MB/s
SusWrite
Peak Sequential Sustained Write 60s Average
364 MB/s Much faster peak sustained write speed.
+33%
273 MB/s
Market Share
Based on 77,604,214 SSDs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.02 % 0.06 % Hugely higher market share.
+200%
Value
Value For Money
12.1 % 21.9 % Hugely better value.
+82%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
54 % 55 % +2%
Price
Price (score)
$91 $40 Much cheaper.
+56%
Age
Newest
118 Months 101 Months More recent.
+14%
DQ Read
Peak 4K-64Thread Read Speed
281 MB/s Faster peak deep queue read.
+19%
236 MB/s
DQ Write
Peak 4K-64Thread Write Speed
324 MB/s 326 MB/s +1%
AS-SSD Total
AS-SSD Total Score
1,023 Pts Slightly stronger server IO.
+5%
972 Pts
DQ Mixed
Peak 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
198 MB/s 306 MB/s Much faster peak deep queue mixed IO.
+55%
ADQ Read
Avg. 4K-64Thread Read Speed
259 MB/s Faster deep queue read.
+20%
216 MB/s
ADQ Write
Avg. 4K-64Thread Write Speed
274 MB/s Slightly faster deep queue write.
+7%
257 MB/s
ADQ Mixed
Avg. 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
173 MB/s 245 MB/s Much faster deep queue mixed IO.
+42%
Capacity
Capacity
250GB 275GB

The 250GB Crucial BX100 SSD is the value orientated variant of Crucial's M range of SSDs. The BX100 uses the same NAND as its premium MX200 sibling but the BX100 uses a Silicon Motion controller as opposed to the Marvel controller found in the MX range. Feature wise the BX100 is missing SLC caching and there is no hardware encryption (so security frameworks such as windows Bitlocker will operate less efficiently). In terms of I/O performance the BX100 looks promising. Comparing the BX100 and MX100 shows that the newer BX100 may be faster than its predecessor but as yet there are insufficient user benchmarks to draw any definitive conclusions. The BX100 has only just started hitting the shelves so there's plenty of room for price reductions from its already reasonable price tag. I will revisit this review when I have more performance data for the BX100. [Jan '15 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

The 275GB Crucial MX300 supersedes the MX200. Unlike its predecessor, the MX300 is TLC based and therefore suffers from weak write speeds in comparison to MLC drives. The MX300 utilises a sophisticated algorithm to enable fast burst write speeds provided that there is sufficient free space on the disk but as the drive fills up write performance drops to the relatively poor levels seen on other TLC drives (similar to mechanical drives). At current prices (70 USD) the MX300 competes well with other low end drives such as the OCZ Trion, Adata SP550 and Samsung 750 EVO. As stocks build the MX300 is likely to see further price cuts, so it could become a very interesting value proposition. See the current value leaders here[Sep '16 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

Solid State Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 SSD Rankings

Welcome to our SSD comparison. We calculate effective speed for both SATA and NVMe drives based on real world performance then adjust by current prices per GB to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top SSDs. [SSDrivePro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your SSD? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback