Today's hottest deals
CrucialCT256M550SSD1
$152
CrucialCT240M500SSD1
 $152 

Controller: Marvell 88SS9189. Flash Memory: Micron Synchronous 20nm MLC. Release date: Q1 2014.

Controller: Marvell 88SS9187. Flash Memory: Micron Synchronous 20nm MLC. Release date: Q1 2013.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 40,112 user samples
8,333 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 113% 106GB free
Worst Bench: 60% 231GB free
Poor: 60% Great: 113%
SPEED RANK: 328th / 1080
31,779 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 91% 121GB free
Worst Bench: 57% 90GB free (System drive)
Poor: 57% Great: 91%
SPEED RANK: 551st / 1080
Effective Speed
Effective SSD Speed
90.5 % Faster effective speed.
+18%
76.6 %
Read
Avg. Sequential Read Speed
418 MB/s +1% 413 MB/s
Write
Avg. Sequential Write Speed
416 MB/s Much faster write speed.
+62%
256 MB/s
4K Read
Avg. 4K Random Read Speed
27.1 MB/s Faster random read.
+18%
22.9 MB/s
4K Write
Avg. 4K Random Write Speed
85 MB/s +5% 81.1 MB/s
Mixed
Avg. Sequential Mixed IO Speed
299 MB/s +3% 291 MB/s
4K Mixed
Avg. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
37.9 MB/s Faster random mixed IO.
+19%
31.9 MB/s
SusWrite
Avg. Sustained Write Speed
311 MB/s Much faster sustained write speed.
+60%
194 MB/s
Read
Peak Sequential Read Speed
466 MB/s Slightly faster peak read speed.
+5%
442 MB/s
Write
Peak Sequential Write Speed
470 MB/s Much faster peak write speed.
+70%
276 MB/s
4K Read
Peak 4K Random Read Speed
31.9 MB/s Faster peak random read.
+20%
26.5 MB/s
4K Write
Peak 4K Random Write Speed
118 MB/s +2% 116 MB/s
Mixed
Peak Sequential Mixed IO Speed
333 MB/s Slightly faster peak mixed IO speed.
+7%
310 MB/s
4K Mixed
Peak 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
46.4 MB/s Faster peak random mixed IO.
+21%
38.4 MB/s
SusWrite
Peak Sequential Sustained Write 60s Average
459 MB/s Much faster peak sustained write speed.
+69%
272 MB/s
Market Share
Based on 77,608,100 SSDs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.01 % 0.02 % Hugely higher market share.
+100%
Value
Value For Money
8.68 % 12.2 % Much better value.
+40%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
52 % 54 % +4%
Price
Price (score)
$152 $73 Much cheaper.
+52%
Age
Newest
128 Months Slightly more recent.
+9%
140 Months
DQ Read
Peak 4K-64Thread Read Speed
387 MB/s Faster peak deep queue read.
+18%
328 MB/s
DQ Write
Peak 4K-64Thread Write Speed
361 MB/s Much faster peak deep queue write.
+37%
264 MB/s
AS-SSD Total
AS-SSD Total Score
1,240 Pts Stronger server IO.
+23%
1,011 Pts
DQ Mixed
Peak 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
240 MB/s Faster peak deep queue mixed IO.
+28%
188 MB/s
ADQ Read
Avg. 4K-64Thread Read Speed
311 MB/s Slightly faster deep queue read.
+5%
296 MB/s
ADQ Write
Avg. 4K-64Thread Write Speed
282 MB/s Faster deep queue write.
+18%
238 MB/s
ADQ Mixed
Avg. 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
201 MB/s Faster deep queue mixed IO.
+21%
166 MB/s
Capacity
Capacity
256GB 240GB

The 256GB Crucial M550 is a welcome improvement over the 240GB M500. The new Marvel 88SS9189 controller has addressed our primary concern with the M500 which was poor sequential write speed. With sequential read/write speeds of 510/478 MB/s the M550 has a healthy core performance profile. Comparing the M550 and M500 shows that the new M550 leads on nearly every single performance metric. Unfortunately the M550 is priced significantly higher than the M500 but prices will likely drop as retailers build up stocks of the new M550. A key comparable for the M550 is the similarly priced market leading Samsung Evo. Comparing the Evo and M550 shows that the Evo is around 11% slower in terms of effective speed[Mar '14 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

We had high expectations for the Crucial M500. Crucial have a long history of producing outstanding Solid State drives. Both the RealSSD 300 and the M4, three and two years old, were almost legendary in terms of reliability and performance. The M500 falls far short of our expectations. The drive is relatively cheap and as such we were expecting to compromise on performance but the M500 just falls too far short. With a Real World Performance of 377.5 MBps which is in the bottom 40% and an AS-SSD score of 901 points (50th percentile) the M500 demonstrates relatively weak real world and average server performance. The M500 is competing with the Sandisk Ultra which manages to squeeze out significantly more performance despite sitting in the same price bracket. [Jun '13 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

Solid State Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 SSD Rankings

Welcome to our SSD comparison. We calculate effective speed for both SATA and NVMe drives based on real world performance then adjust by current prices per GB to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top SSDs. [SSDrivePro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your SSD? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback