HyperXSHFS37A/120G
SanDiskSDSSDHII-240G-G25

Controller: LSI SandForce SF2281. NAND Memory: Micron 20nm MLC. Release date: Q2 2014.

Controller: Marvell 88SS9187. Memory: SanDisk 19nm TLC. Release date: Q3 2014.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 65,334 user samples
11,403 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 75% 22GB free
Worst Bench: 52% 43GB free (System drive)
Poor: 52% Great: 75%
SPEED RANK: 758th / 1074
53,931 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 101% 220GB free
Worst Bench: 58% 120GB free
Poor: 58% Great: 101%
SPEED RANK: 454th / 1074
Effective Speed
Effective SSD Speed
63.7 % 82.2 % Faster effective speed.
+29%
Read
Avg. Sequential Read Speed
349 MB/s 446 MB/s Faster read speed.
+28%
Write
Avg. Sequential Write Speed
125 MB/s 367 MB/s Hugely faster write speed.
+194%
4K Read
Avg. 4K Random Read Speed
26 MB/s 29.8 MB/s Faster random read.
+15%
4K Write
Avg. 4K Random Write Speed
82.1 MB/s Slightly faster random write.
+6%
77.3 MB/s
Mixed
Avg. Sequential Mixed IO Speed
173 MB/s 255 MB/s Much faster mixed IO speed.
+47%
4K Mixed
Avg. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
34 MB/s 36.4 MB/s Slightly faster random mixed IO.
+7%
SusWrite
Avg. Sustained Write Speed
96.3 MB/s 179 MB/s Hugely faster sustained write speed.
+86%
Read
Peak Sequential Read Speed
454 MB/s 504 MB/s Faster peak read speed.
+11%
Write
Peak Sequential Write Speed
156 MB/s 477 MB/s Hugely faster peak write speed.
+206%
4K Read
Peak 4K Random Read Speed
33.1 MB/s 39.1 MB/s Faster peak random read.
+18%
4K Write
Peak 4K Random Write Speed
110 MB/s 112 MB/s +2%
Mixed
Peak Sequential Mixed IO Speed
209 MB/s 352 MB/s Much faster peak mixed IO speed.
+68%
4K Mixed
Peak 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
42.7 MB/s 50 MB/s Faster peak random mixed IO.
+17%
SusWrite
Peak Sequential Sustained Write 60s Average
124 MB/s 254 MB/s Hugely faster peak sustained write speed.
+105%
Market Share
Based on 76,093,069 SSDs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.04 % Much higher market share.
+33%
0.03 %
Value
Value For Money
3.34 % 20.5 % Hugely better value.
+514%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
54 % 54 %
Price
Price (score)
$160 $40 Much cheaper.
+75%
Age
Newest
120 Months 117 Months +2%
DQ Read
Peak 4K-64Thread Read Speed
118 MB/s 390 MB/s Hugely faster peak deep queue read.
+231%
DQ Write
Peak 4K-64Thread Write Speed
154 MB/s 310 MB/s Hugely faster peak deep queue write.
+101%
AS-SSD Total
AS-SSD Total Score
576 Pts 1,207 Pts Hugely stronger server IO.
+110%
DQ Mixed
Peak 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
126 MB/s 254 MB/s Hugely faster peak deep queue mixed IO.
+102%
ADQ Read
Avg. 4K-64Thread Read Speed
94.9 MB/s 325 MB/s Hugely faster deep queue read.
+242%
ADQ Write
Avg. 4K-64Thread Write Speed
130 MB/s 244 MB/s Hugely faster deep queue write.
+88%
ADQ Mixed
Avg. 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
102 MB/s 202 MB/s Hugely faster deep queue mixed IO.
+98%
Capacity
Capacity
120GB 240GB
ADVERTISEMENT

The Kingston HyperX Fury has the same controller as its HyperX 3K sibling; the only difference between the two drives is the use of cheaper Micron 20nm NAND in the newer Fury. Comparing the performance differences between the HyperX Fury and 3K shows that the newer 20nm NAND results in an effective performance decrease of around 30% for a price saving of just 12%. The Fury was never aimed at the high performance sector of the market but given the known compressible performance weaknesses of its Sandforce 2281 controller and its relatively non-budget price tag, the 120GB Fury will struggle to find rational takers in today's market. There are far better value alternatives available for just a few more dollars. [Sep '14 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

The Sandisk Ultra II sits above Sandisk's Ultra Plus and below their Extreme Pro. The Ultra Plus would probably have been phased out completely were it not for its continued success within budget space. The Ultra II is the first Sandisk drive to utilize cheaper (and slower) TLC NAND. Similarly to the Extreme Pro, the Ultra II utilizes an nCache which operates a portion of the NAND in simulated SLC mode. This strategy also matches the one employed by Samsung's now 14 months old Evo. Comparing the Ultra II and Evo shows broad performance equivalence which given the Ultra II's 15% price discount makes it the better choice today. That said it's probably worth waiting for the release of the 850 Evo which will pack another 14 months of Samsung's market leading R&D and will probably steal the show. [Sep '14 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

Solid State Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 SSD Rankings

Welcome to our 2.5" and M.2 SSD comparison. We calculate effective speed for both SATA and NVMe drives based on real world performance then adjust by current prices per GB to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top SSDs. [SSDrivePro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your SSD? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback