Today's hottest deals
KingstonSA400S37/240G
CrucialCT250MX500SSD1

Controller: Phison PS3111-S11. Flash Memory: Toshiba 15nm TLC. Release date: Q1 2017.

Controller: Silicon Motion SM2258. Flash Memory: Micron 3D TLC. Release date: Q4 2017.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 501,465 user samples
424,288 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 100% 181GB free (System drive)
Worst Bench: 33% 119GB free (System drive)
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
SPEED RANK: 742nd / 1080
77,177 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 123% 74GB free
Worst Bench: 73% 64GB free (System drive)
Poor: 73% Great: 123%
SPEED RANK: 260th / 1080
Effective Speed
Effective SSD Speed
65.8 % 101 % Much faster effective speed.
+54%
Read
Avg. Sequential Read Speed
414 MB/s 451 MB/s Slightly faster read speed.
+9%
Write
Avg. Sequential Write Speed
318 MB/s 394 MB/s Faster write speed.
+24%
4K Read
Avg. 4K Random Read Speed
26.7 MB/s 33.7 MB/s Faster random read.
+26%
4K Write
Avg. 4K Random Write Speed
56.9 MB/s 83.4 MB/s Much faster random write.
+47%
Mixed
Avg. Sequential Mixed IO Speed
260 MB/s 386 MB/s Much faster mixed IO speed.
+48%
4K Mixed
Avg. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
22.4 MB/s 45.4 MB/s Hugely faster random mixed IO.
+103%
SusWrite
Avg. Sustained Write Speed
179 MB/s 352 MB/s Hugely faster sustained write speed.
+97%
Read
Peak Sequential Read Speed
504 MB/s 514 MB/s +2%
Write
Peak Sequential Write Speed
446 MB/s 466 MB/s +4%
4K Read
Peak 4K Random Read Speed
36.1 MB/s 42.6 MB/s Faster peak random read.
+18%
4K Write
Peak 4K Random Write Speed
106 MB/s 116 MB/s Slightly faster peak random write.
+9%
Mixed
Peak Sequential Mixed IO Speed
420 MB/s 450 MB/s Slightly faster peak mixed IO speed.
+7%
4K Mixed
Peak 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
42 MB/s 58.3 MB/s Much faster peak random mixed IO.
+39%
SusWrite
Peak Sequential Sustained Write 60s Average
432 MB/s 458 MB/s Slightly faster peak sustained write speed.
+6%
Market Share
Based on 77,526,934 SSDs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
1.45 % Hugely higher market share.
+867%
0.15 %
Value
Value For Money
23.3 % 26 % Better value.
+11%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
54 % 56 % +4%
Price
Price (score)
$25 Much cheaper.
+38%
$40
Age
Newest
94 Months 82 Months More recent.
+13%
DQ Read
Peak 4K-64Thread Read Speed
288 MB/s 384 MB/s Much faster peak deep queue read.
+33%
DQ Write
Peak 4K-64Thread Write Speed
349 MB/s 359 MB/s +3%
AS-SSD Total
AS-SSD Total Score
1,076 Pts 1,258 Pts Stronger server IO.
+17%
DQ Mixed
Peak 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
204 MB/s 278 MB/s Much faster peak deep queue mixed IO.
+36%
ADQ Read
Avg. 4K-64Thread Read Speed
191 MB/s 329 MB/s Much faster deep queue read.
+72%
ADQ Write
Avg. 4K-64Thread Write Speed
214 MB/s 294 MB/s Much faster deep queue write.
+37%
ADQ Mixed
Avg. 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
92.7 MB/s 219 MB/s Hugely faster deep queue mixed IO.
+136%
Capacity
Capacity
240GB 250GB

could have used some DRAM, stutters when booting. [Dec '19 ExecutableFiles]

MORE DETAILS

The MX500 is Crucial’s current flagship consumer SATA SSD featuring their latest second generation 64-layer 3D TLC NAND. It’s available in 250 GB, 500 GB, 1 TB and 2 TB capacities in a 2.5-inch form factor. All but the 2 TB version will also be available in M.2 (2280) form in the future. The MX500 features a Silicon Motion SM2258 controller which is a change from the Marvell 88SS1074 controller featured in the MX300 (it’s nearly two year old predecessor). Performance is around 30% better than on the MX300 which currently retails at the same price. The MX500 has an SLC cache which increases with drive capacity. Consequently, the larger capacities are better able to sustain high sequential write speeds. The 250 GB version has 250MB of SLC cache, the 500 GB has 512 MB, the 1 TB has 1 GB and the 2 TB has 2 GB. Extended sustained write performance tests show that even though speed does drop off after the cache has been exhausted, it is still maintained at very respectable levels. The MX500’s five year warranty is in line with Samsung’s 850 Evo and exceeds it in terms of endurance (just 75 TBW for the 250 GB 850 Evo versus 100 TBW for the 250 GB MX500). It doesn’t quite match up to the Samsung’s 850 Evo’s performance (effective speed 8% slower), however at current prices it is about 20% cheaper, and on balance offers better value for money. [Mar '18 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

Solid State Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 SSD Rankings

Welcome to our SSD comparison. We calculate effective speed for both SATA and NVMe drives based on real world performance then adjust by current prices per GB to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top SSDs. [SSDrivePro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your SSD? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback