KingstonSVP200S3/240G
$193
CrucialCT128MX100SSD1
$74
 $193 

Controller: LSI SandForce SF-2281VB1-SDC. NAND: Intel Asynchronous 25nm MLC. Release date: Q1 2012.

 $74 

Controller: Marvell 88SS9189. Flash Memory: Micron 16nm MLC. Release date: Q2 2014.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 10,460 user samples
568 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 91% 221GB free
Worst Bench: 53% 35GB free (System drive)
Poor: 53% Great: 91%
SPEED RANK: 634th / 1073
9,892 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 89% 42GB free
Worst Bench: 56% 119GB free
Poor: 56% Great: 89%
SPEED RANK: 560th / 1073
Effective Speed
Effective SSD Speed
71.8 % 75.9 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+6%
Read
Avg. Sequential Read Speed
373 MB/s 431 MB/s Faster read speed.
+16%
Write
Avg. Sequential Write Speed
195 MB/s Slightly faster write speed.
+9%
179 MB/s
4K Read
Avg. 4K Random Read Speed
28 MB/s Slightly faster random read.
+5%
26.6 MB/s
4K Write
Avg. 4K Random Write Speed
73.5 MB/s 87.1 MB/s Faster random write.
+19%
Mixed
Avg. Sequential Mixed IO Speed
230 MB/s Slightly faster mixed IO speed.
+6%
217 MB/s
4K Mixed
Avg. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
33.9 MB/s 35 MB/s +3%
SusWrite
Avg. Sustained Write Speed
156 MB/s Faster sustained write speed.
+12%
139 MB/s
Read
Peak Sequential Read Speed
460 MB/s 473 MB/s +3%
Write
Peak Sequential Write Speed
261 MB/s Much faster peak write speed.
+40%
187 MB/s
4K Read
Peak 4K Random Read Speed
36.2 MB/s Faster peak random read.
+19%
30.5 MB/s
4K Write
Peak 4K Random Write Speed
110 MB/s 121 MB/s Slightly faster peak random write.
+10%
Mixed
Peak Sequential Mixed IO Speed
290 MB/s Faster peak mixed IO speed.
+24%
233 MB/s
4K Mixed
Peak 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
46.8 MB/s Faster peak random mixed IO.
+12%
41.7 MB/s
SusWrite
Peak Sequential Sustained Write 60s Average
221 MB/s Faster peak sustained write speed.
+20%
184 MB/s
Market Share
Based on 76,098,005 SSDs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0 % 0.01 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
Value
Value For Money
5.5 % 7.44 % Much better value.
+35%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
51 % 52 % +2%
Price
Price (score)
$193 $74 Much cheaper.
+62%
Age
Newest
149 Months 120 Months More recent.
+19%
DQ Read
Peak 4K-64Thread Read Speed
295 MB/s 316 MB/s Slightly faster peak deep queue read.
+7%
DQ Write
Peak 4K-64Thread Write Speed
249 MB/s Much faster peak deep queue write.
+34%
186 MB/s
AS-SSD Total
AS-SSD Total Score
959 Pts +5% 917 Pts
DQ Mixed
Peak 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
188 MB/s Faster peak deep queue mixed IO.
+11%
170 MB/s
ADQ Read
Avg. 4K-64Thread Read Speed
223 MB/s 286 MB/s Faster deep queue read.
+28%
ADQ Write
Avg. 4K-64Thread Write Speed
179 MB/s Faster deep queue write.
+13%
159 MB/s
ADQ Mixed
Avg. 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
157 MB/s +4% 151 MB/s
Capacity
Capacity
240GB 128GB
ADVERTISEMENT

The SSDNow V+200 is one of the slowest SSD's we have seen recently. Its sequential and 4k read performance is the weakest we have seen to date. Even the sequential and 4k write speeds are amongst the lowest we have seen. The only above average performance metric for this drive is its deep queue depth write speed which clocked in at 207 MB/s. Rightfully the drive is priced lower than most of its competitors but that does not make up for its poor performance. There are far better deals to be had elsewhere. [Jan '13 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

The Crucial 128GB MX100 has the smallest capacity and is the slowest of the MX100 range. Comparing the 128GB and 256GB MX100s shows that the 256GB version has a 75% faster write speed. Within the MX100 range write speeds scale linearly with capacity, as a consequence, the 128GB version struggles to compete with similarly priced drives from other manufacturers. On the other hand, the 512GB version and to a lesser extent the 256GB version offer far better value for money. Overall the MX100 has an effective speed which is amongst the top 30% of 128GB drives so its not bad by any means but there are however both cheaper and faster alternatives available in the now extremely competitive 128GB SSD category. [Oct '14 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

Solid State Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 SSD Rankings

Welcome to our 2.5" and M.2 SSD comparison. We calculate effective speed for both SATA and NVMe drives based on real world performance then adjust by current prices per GB to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top SSDs. [SSDrivePro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your SSD? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback