Today's hottest deals
KingstonSV300S37A/240G
SamsungMZ-7PD128BW

Controller: LSI SandForce SF2281. Flash Memory: Toshiba 19nm Toggle Mode MLC. Release date: Q4 2012.

Controller: Samsung 3-core MDX. Flash Memory: Samsung 21nm Toggle Mode MLC. Release date: Q4 2012.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 211,555 user samples
176,713 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 85% 223GB free
Worst Bench: 41% 91GB free (System drive)
Poor: 41% Great: 85%
SPEED RANK: 760th / 1080
34,842 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 110% 62GB free
Worst Bench: 62% 119GB free
Poor: 62% Great: 110%
SPEED RANK: 344th / 1080
Effective Speed
Effective SSD Speed
64.1 % 89.5 % Much faster effective speed.
+40%
Read
Avg. Sequential Read Speed
286 MB/s 444 MB/s Much faster read speed.
+55%
Write
Avg. Sequential Write Speed
209 MB/s 336 MB/s Much faster write speed.
+61%
4K Read
Avg. 4K Random Read Speed
23.7 MB/s 30.5 MB/s Faster random read.
+29%
4K Write
Avg. 4K Random Write Speed
78.4 MB/s 81.6 MB/s +4%
Mixed
Avg. Sequential Mixed IO Speed
221 MB/s 268 MB/s Faster mixed IO speed.
+21%
4K Mixed
Avg. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
32.8 MB/s 35.9 MB/s Slightly faster random mixed IO.
+9%
SusWrite
Avg. Sustained Write Speed
132 MB/s 286 MB/s Hugely faster sustained write speed.
+117%
Read
Peak Sequential Read Speed
416 MB/s 497 MB/s Faster peak read speed.
+19%
Write
Peak Sequential Write Speed
264 MB/s 445 MB/s Much faster peak write speed.
+69%
4K Read
Peak 4K Random Read Speed
33.1 MB/s 36.3 MB/s Slightly faster peak random read.
+10%
4K Write
Peak 4K Random Write Speed
110 MB/s 113 MB/s +3%
Mixed
Peak Sequential Mixed IO Speed
281 MB/s 331 MB/s Faster peak mixed IO speed.
+18%
4K Mixed
Peak 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
44.2 MB/s +0% 44.1 MB/s
SusWrite
Peak Sequential Sustained Write 60s Average
191 MB/s 440 MB/s Hugely faster peak sustained write speed.
+130%
Market Share
Based on 77,606,037 SSDs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.1 % Hugely higher market share.
+150%
0.04 %
Value
Value For Money
8.35 % Much better value.
+62%
5.17 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
53 % 54 % +2%
Price
Price (score)
$95 Much cheaper.
+37%
$150
Age
Newest
144 Months +1% 145 Months
DQ Read
Peak 4K-64Thread Read Speed
259 MB/s 376 MB/s Much faster peak deep queue read.
+45%
DQ Write
Peak 4K-64Thread Write Speed
255 MB/s 330 MB/s Faster peak deep queue write.
+29%
AS-SSD Total
AS-SSD Total Score
901 Pts 1,196 Pts Much stronger server IO.
+33%
DQ Mixed
Peak 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
213 MB/s Much faster peak deep queue mixed IO.
+37%
155 MB/s
ADQ Read
Avg. 4K-64Thread Read Speed
158 MB/s 332 MB/s Hugely faster deep queue read.
+110%
ADQ Write
Avg. 4K-64Thread Write Speed
192 MB/s 245 MB/s Faster deep queue write.
+28%
ADQ Mixed
Avg. 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
153 MB/s Faster deep queue mixed IO.
+21%
126 MB/s
Capacity
Capacity
240GB 128GB

This is yet another Sandforce 2881 based SSD from Kingston, this time coupled with newer 19nm Nand flash. In terms of performance the V300 is nothing we haven't seen before with other Sandforce based SSDs. A side-by-side comparison with the HyperX shows that the two drives have a near identical performance profile which is more than a little disappointing given that the V300 is 16 months newer. With a sequential write speed of just 280 MB/s the V300 lags the group leaders by 62%, an expected result for a Sandforce based drive. To conclude, Kingston aren't offering anything new with the V300, consequently there are far faster (and cheaper) drives available elsewhere including the excellent Samsung Evo which is the current group leader. [Jan '14 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

The 128GB 840 Pro is a rock solid performer. On release, nearly a year and a half ago, the Pro smashed several speed records. Today, with sequential read/write speeds of 519/438 MBps, the Pro is still one of the fastest SSDs available. One of the Pro's top competitors is Samsungs own, newer 840 Evo. Looking at a raw synthetic speed comparison of the 128GB Pro and Evo is a little misleading. On the face of it the Pro only has a marginal lead over the Evo. This due to the fact that the Evo can only maintain its burst write speed for transfers of up to 3GB, the size of its SLC cache. The Pro on the other hand can sustain higher throughputs indefinitely. The Pro also utilizes MLC which is rated for far more erase cycles than the TLC used in the Evo. Server IO is often continuous and would quickly exhaust the 3GB cache on the Evo but for typical consumer use the Evo will remain within the SLC cache most of the time. [Feb '14 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

Solid State Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 SSD Rankings

Welcome to our SSD comparison. We calculate effective speed for both SATA and NVMe drives based on real world performance then adjust by current prices per GB to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top SSDs. [SSDrivePro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your SSD? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback