Today's hottest deals
OCZVTX460-25SAT3-240G
$203
SanDiskSDSSDXP-120G-G25
$130
 $203 

Controller: Indilinx Barefoot 3 M10. Flash Memory: Toshiba 19nm MLC. Release date: Q1 2014.

 $130 

Controller: Marvell 88SS9187-BLD2. Flash Memory: SanDisk 19nm eX2 ABL MLC. Release date: Q2 2013.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 4,192 user samples
1,730 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 105% 160GB free
Worst Bench: 64% 75GB free (System drive)
Poor: 64% Great: 105%
SPEED RANK: 334th / 1080
2,462 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 101% 112GB free
Worst Bench: 59% 87GB free
Poor: 59% Great: 101%
SPEED RANK: 415th / 1080
Effective Speed
Effective SSD Speed
90.3 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+6%
84.8 %
Read
Avg. Sequential Read Speed
422 MB/s 464 MB/s Slightly faster read speed.
+10%
Write
Avg. Sequential Write Speed
421 MB/s Much faster write speed.
+44%
292 MB/s
4K Read
Avg. 4K Random Read Speed
22.6 MB/s 27.9 MB/s Faster random read.
+23%
4K Write
Avg. 4K Random Write Speed
86.9 MB/s Faster random write.
+10%
78.7 MB/s
Mixed
Avg. Sequential Mixed IO Speed
341 MB/s Much faster mixed IO speed.
+56%
219 MB/s
4K Mixed
Avg. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
33.3 MB/s +2% 32.5 MB/s
SusWrite
Avg. Sustained Write Speed
372 MB/s Much faster sustained write speed.
+43%
260 MB/s
Read
Peak Sequential Read Speed
474 MB/s 509 MB/s Slightly faster peak read speed.
+7%
Write
Peak Sequential Write Speed
482 MB/s Much faster peak write speed.
+48%
326 MB/s
4K Read
Peak 4K Random Read Speed
26.1 MB/s 34.5 MB/s Much faster peak random read.
+32%
4K Write
Peak 4K Random Write Speed
123 MB/s +3% 119 MB/s
Mixed
Peak Sequential Mixed IO Speed
384 MB/s Much faster peak mixed IO speed.
+53%
251 MB/s
4K Mixed
Peak 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
39.1 MB/s 40.5 MB/s +4%
SusWrite
Peak Sequential Sustained Write 60s Average
470 MB/s Much faster peak sustained write speed.
+46%
323 MB/s
Market Share
Based on 77,032,963 SSDs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0 % 0 %
Value
Value For Money
6.65 % Better value.
+28%
5.19 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
53 % +4% 51 %
Price
Price (score)
$203 $130 Much cheaper.
+36%
Age
Newest
128 Months Slightly more recent.
+6%
136 Months
DQ Read
Peak 4K-64Thread Read Speed
338 MB/s 345 MB/s +2%
DQ Write
Peak 4K-64Thread Write Speed
355 MB/s Faster peak deep queue write.
+24%
286 MB/s
AS-SSD Total
AS-SSD Total Score
1,157 Pts Slightly stronger server IO.
+6%
1,091 Pts
DQ Mixed
Peak 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
281 MB/s Hugely faster peak deep queue mixed IO.
+84%
153 MB/s
ADQ Read
Avg. 4K-64Thread Read Speed
295 MB/s 300 MB/s +2%
ADQ Write
Avg. 4K-64Thread Write Speed
284 MB/s Faster deep queue write.
+19%
239 MB/s
ADQ Mixed
Avg. 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
241 MB/s Much faster deep queue mixed IO.
+73%
139 MB/s
Capacity
Capacity
240GB 120GB

The OCZ Vertex 460 replaces the Vertex 450. The main difference between the two is a change from Intel/Micron (IMFT) 20nm MLC NAND to Toshiba 19nm MLC NAND, a fitting move considering that Toshiba acquired OCZ shortly before the Vertex 460's release. Comparing the Vertex 460 and 450 shows that the two drives are broadly on a par in terms of performance. In terms of pricing the Vertex 460 is priced reasonably considering its age, I expect prices will drop rapidly as retailers build stocks of the relatively new drive. At current prices the 240GB Vertex 460 represents above average value for money but struggles to compete with its slightly more expensive sibling, the Vector 150. Comparing the 460 and 150 shows that Vector 150 leads in terms of effective speed by 10% but only costs 5% more than the 460. [Mar '14 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

The 120GB Sandisk Extreme II proved to be a disappointment. I was expecting the same blistering performance as I saw on its larger 240GB sibling but that proved not to be the case. Comparing the 120GB and 240GB Extreme II's reveals that the larger 240GB version has peak speed ratings that are approximately 35% faster that the 120GB Extreme II. The main weakness of the 120GB Extreme II is its sequential write speed which is just 305 MB/s vs 492 MB/s on the 240GB version. Reduced write ability at lower capacities is explained by fewer NAND modules which reduce a controllers ability to parallelize slow write operations across different memory banks. Overall the Sandisk Extreme II sits amongst the bottom 20% of performers in the 120-128GB capacity category. Several of the drives in the group test have comparable performance at both the 120 and 240 GB capacities, those drives are the ones to go for. [Feb '14 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

Solid State Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) September 2024 SSD Rankings

Welcome to our SSD comparison. We calculate effective speed for both SATA and NVMe drives based on real world performance then adjust by current prices per GB to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top SSDs. [SSDrivePro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your SSD? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $253Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback