COMPARE
SSD
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR SSD
ADD TO PC
BUILD
SamsungMZ-7PC128B/WW
$109
OCZVTX460-25SAT3-240G
$203
▲ 52533 ▼
 $109 

Controller: Samsung 3-core MCX. NAND: Samsung 27nm Toggle Mode MLC. Release date: Q4 2011.

VS
▲ 531,540 ▼
 $203 

Controller: Indilinx Barefoot 3 M10. Flash Memory: Toshiba 19nm MLC. Release date: Q1 2014.

Effective Speed 
+43%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 38,980 user samples
Benchmark your SSD here
37,250 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 76% 119GB free
Worst Bench: 48% 68GB free
Poor: 48% Great: 76%
SPEED RANK: 776th / 1080
1,730 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 105% 160GB free
Worst Bench: 64% 75GB free (System drive)
Poor: 64% Great: 105%
SPEED RANK: 334th / 1080
Effective Speed
Effective SSD Speed 		63 % 90.3 % Much faster effective speed.
+43%
Average Score 
+53%
Read
Avg. Sequential Read Speed 		433 MB/s +3% 422 MB/s
Write
Avg. Sequential Write Speed 		215 MB/s 421 MB/s Hugely faster write speed.
+96%
4K Read
Avg. 4K Random Read Speed 		20.6 MB/s 22.6 MB/s Slightly faster random read.
+10%
4K Write
Avg. 4K Random Write Speed 		50.8 MB/s 86.9 MB/s Much faster random write.
+71%
Mixed
Avg. Sequential Mixed IO Speed 		218 MB/s 341 MB/s Much faster mixed IO speed.
+56%
4K Mixed
Avg. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed 		21.5 MB/s 33.3 MB/s Much faster random mixed IO.
+55%
SusWrite
Avg. Sustained Write Speed 		202 MB/s 372 MB/s Hugely faster sustained write speed.
+84%
Peak Score 
+40%
Read
Peak Sequential Read Speed 		490 MB/s +3% 474 MB/s
Write
Peak Sequential Write Speed 		317 MB/s 482 MB/s Much faster peak write speed.
+52%
4K Read
Peak 4K Random Read Speed 		23.9 MB/s 26.1 MB/s Slightly faster peak random read.
+9%
4K Write
Peak 4K Random Write Speed 		66.1 MB/s 123 MB/s Hugely faster peak random write.
+86%
Mixed
Peak Sequential Mixed IO Speed 		294 MB/s 384 MB/s Much faster peak mixed IO speed.
+31%
4K Mixed
Peak 4K Random Mixed IO Speed 		25.5 MB/s 39.1 MB/s Much faster peak random mixed IO.
+53%
SusWrite
Peak Sequential Sustained Write 60s Average 		314 MB/s 470 MB/s Much faster peak sustained write speed.
+50%
Value & Sentiment 
+∞%
Market Share
Based on 76,309,621 SSDs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.03 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞% 		0 %
Value
Value For Money 		4.62 % 6.65 % Much better value.
+44%
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		52 % 53 % +2%
Price
Price (score) 		$109 Much cheaper.
+46% 		$203
Nice To Haves 
+121%
Age
Newest 		153 Months 125 Months More recent.
+18%
DQ Read
Peak 4K-64Thread Read Speed 		295 MB/s 338 MB/s Faster peak deep queue read.
+15%
DQ Write
Peak 4K-64Thread Write Speed 		86.2 MB/s 355 MB/s Hugely faster peak deep queue write.
+312%
AS-SSD Total
AS-SSD Total Score 		739 Pts 1,157 Pts Much stronger server IO.
+57%
DQ Mixed
Peak 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed 		134 MB/s 281 MB/s Hugely faster peak deep queue mixed IO.
+110%
ADQ Read
Avg. 4K-64Thread Read Speed 		260 MB/s 295 MB/s Faster deep queue read.
+13%
ADQ Write
Avg. 4K-64Thread Write Speed 		67.4 MB/s 284 MB/s Hugely faster deep queue write.
+321%
ADQ Mixed
Avg. 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed 		107 MB/s 241 MB/s Hugely faster deep queue mixed IO.
+125%
Specifications 
Capacity
Capacity 		128GB 240GB
Conclusion 
Average Bench 63%
Average Bench 90.3%
ADVERTISEMENT

The 128GB Samsung 830 is nearly two and a half years old which puts it at a significant disadvantage to more recent models. With peak and average sequential read/write speeds of 512/323 and 410/239 MB/s it's not too shabby, especially considering its age. The sequential figures actually match the current group leaders. The small file 4K peak and average read/write speeds of 22.5/60.3 and 17/40 MB/s are not as impressive and lag the group leaders by 50%. Reduced small file performance weighs on the 128GB 830's effective speed which is 376 MB/s and 20% lower than the average of 453 MB/s for the highest voted group leaders. Finally comparing the 128 and 256GB versions shows that the larger drive has a superior performance profile, which is not uncommon for SSDs but newer models from Samsung don't share this trait. [Feb '14 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

The OCZ Vertex 460 replaces the Vertex 450. The main difference between the two is a change from Intel/Micron (IMFT) 20nm MLC NAND to Toshiba 19nm MLC NAND, a fitting move considering that Toshiba acquired OCZ shortly before the Vertex 460's release. Comparing the Vertex 460 and 450 shows that the two drives are broadly on a par in terms of performance. In terms of pricing the Vertex 460 is priced reasonably considering its age, I expect prices will drop rapidly as retailers build stocks of the relatively new drive. At current prices the 240GB Vertex 460 represents above average value for money but struggles to compete with its slightly more expensive sibling, the Vector 150. Comparing the 460 and 150 shows that Vector 150 leads in terms of effective speed by 10% but only costs 5% more than the 460. [Mar '14 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
37,250
1,730
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Solid State Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 SSD Rankings

Welcome to our SSD comparison. We calculate effective speed for both SATA and NVMe drives based on real world performance then adjust by current prices per GB to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top SSDs. [SSDrivePro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your SSD? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Storage Devices FAQ
What is sustained sequential write speed?
What’s the difference between SLC, MLC and TLC?
What is 3D XPoint and how fast is it?
What’s the difference between SATA, PCIe and NVMe?
What’s the difference between NAND and V-NAND?
What is sequential write speed?
What is sequential read speed?
What is incompressible data?
What is queue depth?
Solid State Drives
What is the SSD value for money rating?
What is 4K 64 thread write speed?
Can CPU power saving states (C1,C2,C3) impact SSD speed?
What is the effective SSD speed index?
How is the AS SSD write score calculated?
How is the AS SSD read score calculated?
How is the AS SSD total score calculated?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback