Today's hottest deals
SamsungMZ-7TE250BW
PlextorPX-128M5P

Controller: Samsung 3 Core MEX. Memory: Samsung 19nm Toggle Mode TLC. Release date: Q3 2013.

Controller: Marvell 88SS9187-BLD2. NAND Memory: Toshiba 19nm Toggle Mode MLC. Release date: Q3 2012.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 221,591 user samples
217,115 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 118% 68GB free
Worst Bench: 64% 231GB free
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
SPEED RANK: 284th / 1080
4,476 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 98% 64GB free
Worst Bench: 63% 14GB free
Poor: 63% Great: 98%
SPEED RANK: 436th / 1080
Effective Speed
Effective SSD Speed
95.9 % Faster effective speed.
+14%
83.8 %
Read
Avg. Sequential Read Speed
465 MB/s +3% 451 MB/s
Write
Avg. Sequential Write Speed
394 MB/s Faster write speed.
+29%
305 MB/s
4K Read
Avg. 4K Random Read Speed
38.8 MB/s Much faster random read.
+40%
27.8 MB/s
4K Write
Avg. 4K Random Write Speed
85.3 MB/s Much faster random write.
+35%
63.1 MB/s
Mixed
Avg. Sequential Mixed IO Speed
347 MB/s Much faster mixed IO speed.
+34%
259 MB/s
4K Mixed
Avg. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
48 MB/s Much faster random mixed IO.
+49%
32.3 MB/s
SusWrite
Avg. Sustained Write Speed
195 MB/s 284 MB/s Much faster sustained write speed.
+46%
Read
Peak Sequential Read Speed
507 MB/s +2% 499 MB/s
Write
Peak Sequential Write Speed
489 MB/s Much faster peak write speed.
+50%
325 MB/s
4K Read
Peak 4K Random Read Speed
46.7 MB/s Much faster peak random read.
+37%
34.2 MB/s
4K Write
Peak 4K Random Write Speed
119 MB/s Much faster peak random write.
+33%
89.2 MB/s
Mixed
Peak Sequential Mixed IO Speed
418 MB/s Much faster peak mixed IO speed.
+43%
292 MB/s
4K Mixed
Peak 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
59.8 MB/s Much faster peak random mixed IO.
+44%
41.4 MB/s
SusWrite
Peak Sequential Sustained Write 60s Average
299 MB/s 317 MB/s Slightly faster peak sustained write speed.
+6%
Market Share
Based on 77,395,146 SSDs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.14 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,300%
0.01 %
Value
Value For Money
12.5 % Hugely better value.
+132%
5.38 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
53 % +2% 52 %
Price
Price (score)
$99 Cheaper.
+24%
$130
Age
Newest
136 Months Slightly more recent.
+7%
146 Months
DQ Read
Peak 4K-64Thread Read Speed
383 MB/s Slightly faster peak deep queue read.
+6%
360 MB/s
DQ Write
Peak 4K-64Thread Write Speed
362 MB/s Faster peak deep queue write.
+15%
314 MB/s
AS-SSD Total
AS-SSD Total Score
1,273 Pts Stronger server IO.
+15%
1,110 Pts
DQ Mixed
Peak 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
237 MB/s Faster peak deep queue mixed IO.
+11%
213 MB/s
ADQ Read
Avg. 4K-64Thread Read Speed
337 MB/s Faster deep queue read.
+10%
305 MB/s
ADQ Write
Avg. 4K-64Thread Write Speed
293 MB/s Faster deep queue write.
+14%
258 MB/s
ADQ Mixed
Avg. 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
203 MB/s Faster deep queue mixed IO.
+13%
180 MB/s
Capacity
Capacity
250GB 128GB

The Evo is remarkable in that, like the Sandisk Extreme II, it features a second level cache. For the 250 GB Evo this consists of a 3 GB Turbowrite cache (TWC) which is a block of high speed Flash Memory. When the TWC is exhausted write speeds drop by approximately 50% but that won't often happen under typical consumer workloads. In terms of raw performance, even with its cache, the Evo still isn't the fastest drive. With a real world speed index reading of 439 MB/s the EVO is however, within reach of the two speed leaders (Vector and 850 Pro). At a price point of $130 the Evo is around 30% cheaper making it the best value for money SSDs I have seen in 2014. Comparing the Evo and the Sandisk Ultra Plus shows that the Evo is the winner but the Sandisk may be a viable alternative thanks to its cache-free, and therefore more consistent performance during extended writes. [Aug '14 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

The 128GB Plextor M5 Pro has a reasonable performance profile. With an effective speed of 442 MB/s it ranks just 5% below the average of the top ten user rated 128GB SSDs, a good result. The M5 Pro's server orientated deep queue read/write speeds clocked in at 345/282 MB/s, slightly above average. As a consequence of having fewer NAND modules, the 128GB version is around 40% slower at sequential writing than its 256GB sibling. The larger capacity M5 Pro represents significantly better value for money. In the 128GB category some manufacturers (Samsung/OCZ) are offering the same sorts of speeds as typically seen in the faster 256GB category. In terms of performance, those SSDs currently stand heads and shoulders above the rest of the 128GB pack. There are several better value for money alternatives to the 128GB M5 Pro in the group test[Feb '14 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

Solid State Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 SSD Rankings

Welcome to our SSD comparison. We calculate effective speed for both SATA and NVMe drives based on real world performance then adjust by current prices per GB to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top SSDs. [SSDrivePro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your SSD? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback