Today's hottest deals
SamsungMZ-7PD128BW
SamsungMZ-7TE250BW

Controller: Samsung 3-core MDX. Flash Memory: Samsung 21nm Toggle Mode MLC. Release date: Q4 2012.

Controller: Samsung 3 Core MEX. Memory: Samsung 19nm Toggle Mode TLC. Release date: Q3 2013.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 251,957 user samples
34,842 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 110% 62GB free
Worst Bench: 62% 119GB free
Poor: 62% Great: 110%
SPEED RANK: 344th / 1080
217,115 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 118% 68GB free
Worst Bench: 64% 231GB free
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
SPEED RANK: 284th / 1080
Effective Speed
Effective SSD Speed
89.5 % 95.9 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+7%
Read
Avg. Sequential Read Speed
444 MB/s 465 MB/s +5%
Write
Avg. Sequential Write Speed
336 MB/s 394 MB/s Faster write speed.
+17%
4K Read
Avg. 4K Random Read Speed
30.5 MB/s 38.8 MB/s Faster random read.
+27%
4K Write
Avg. 4K Random Write Speed
81.6 MB/s 85.3 MB/s +5%
Mixed
Avg. Sequential Mixed IO Speed
268 MB/s 347 MB/s Faster mixed IO speed.
+29%
4K Mixed
Avg. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
35.9 MB/s 48 MB/s Much faster random mixed IO.
+34%
SusWrite
Avg. Sustained Write Speed
286 MB/s Much faster sustained write speed.
+47%
195 MB/s
Read
Peak Sequential Read Speed
497 MB/s 507 MB/s +2%
Write
Peak Sequential Write Speed
445 MB/s 489 MB/s Slightly faster peak write speed.
+10%
4K Read
Peak 4K Random Read Speed
36.3 MB/s 46.7 MB/s Faster peak random read.
+29%
4K Write
Peak 4K Random Write Speed
113 MB/s 119 MB/s Slightly faster peak random write.
+5%
Mixed
Peak Sequential Mixed IO Speed
331 MB/s 418 MB/s Faster peak mixed IO speed.
+26%
4K Mixed
Peak 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
44.1 MB/s 59.8 MB/s Much faster peak random mixed IO.
+36%
SusWrite
Peak Sequential Sustained Write 60s Average
440 MB/s Much faster peak sustained write speed.
+47%
299 MB/s
Market Share
Based on 77,608,390 SSDs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.04 % 0.17 % Hugely higher market share.
+325%
Value
Value For Money
5.17 % 12.5 % Hugely better value.
+142%
User Rating
UBM User Rating
54 % +2% 53 %
Price
Price (score)
$150 $99 Much cheaper.
+34%
Age
Newest
145 Months 136 Months Slightly more recent.
+6%
DQ Read
Peak 4K-64Thread Read Speed
376 MB/s 383 MB/s +2%
DQ Write
Peak 4K-64Thread Write Speed
330 MB/s 362 MB/s Slightly faster peak deep queue write.
+10%
AS-SSD Total
AS-SSD Total Score
1,196 Pts 1,273 Pts Slightly stronger server IO.
+6%
DQ Mixed
Peak 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
155 MB/s 237 MB/s Much faster peak deep queue mixed IO.
+53%
ADQ Read
Avg. 4K-64Thread Read Speed
332 MB/s 337 MB/s +2%
ADQ Write
Avg. 4K-64Thread Write Speed
245 MB/s 293 MB/s Faster deep queue write.
+20%
ADQ Mixed
Avg. 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
126 MB/s 203 MB/s Much faster deep queue mixed IO.
+61%
Capacity
Capacity
128GB 250GB

The 128GB 840 Pro is a rock solid performer. On release, nearly a year and a half ago, the Pro smashed several speed records. Today, with sequential read/write speeds of 519/438 MBps, the Pro is still one of the fastest SSDs available. One of the Pro's top competitors is Samsungs own, newer 840 Evo. Looking at a raw synthetic speed comparison of the 128GB Pro and Evo is a little misleading. On the face of it the Pro only has a marginal lead over the Evo. This due to the fact that the Evo can only maintain its burst write speed for transfers of up to 3GB, the size of its SLC cache. The Pro on the other hand can sustain higher throughputs indefinitely. The Pro also utilizes MLC which is rated for far more erase cycles than the TLC used in the Evo. Server IO is often continuous and would quickly exhaust the 3GB cache on the Evo but for typical consumer use the Evo will remain within the SLC cache most of the time. [Feb '14 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

The Evo is remarkable in that, like the Sandisk Extreme II, it features a second level cache. For the 250 GB Evo this consists of a 3 GB Turbowrite cache (TWC) which is a block of high speed Flash Memory. When the TWC is exhausted write speeds drop by approximately 50% but that won't often happen under typical consumer workloads. In terms of raw performance, even with its cache, the Evo still isn't the fastest drive. With a real world speed index reading of 439 MB/s the EVO is however, within reach of the two speed leaders (Vector and 850 Pro). At a price point of $130 the Evo is around 30% cheaper making it the best value for money SSDs I have seen in 2014. Comparing the Evo and the Sandisk Ultra Plus shows that the Evo is the winner but the Sandisk may be a viable alternative thanks to its cache-free, and therefore more consistent performance during extended writes. [Aug '14 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

Solid State Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 SSD Rankings

Welcome to our SSD comparison. We calculate effective speed for both SATA and NVMe drives based on real world performance then adjust by current prices per GB to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top SSDs. [SSDrivePro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your SSD? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback