Today's hottest deals
SamsungMZ-76P256BW
SamsungMZ-7KE256BW

Controller: Samsung MJX. Memory: Samsung 64 layer MLC V-NAND. Release date: Q1 2018.

Controller: Samsung Triple Core MEX. Memory: Samsung 40nm MLC V-NAND. Release date: Q3 2014.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 154,494 user samples
12,565 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 131% 228GB free
Worst Bench: 78% 69GB free (System drive)
Poor: 78% Great: 131%
SPEED RANK: 228th / 1080
141,929 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 124% 238GB free
Worst Bench: 71% 71GB free (System drive)
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
SPEED RANK: 256th / 1080
Effective Speed
Effective SSD Speed
109 % Slightly faster effective speed.
+7%
102 %
Read
Avg. Sequential Read Speed
474 MB/s +1% 469 MB/s
Write
Avg. Sequential Write Speed
419 MB/s Slightly faster write speed.
+6%
396 MB/s
4K Read
Avg. 4K Random Read Speed
37.7 MB/s Faster random read.
+11%
33.9 MB/s
4K Write
Avg. 4K Random Write Speed
93.3 MB/s +4% 89.6 MB/s
Mixed
Avg. Sequential Mixed IO Speed
398 MB/s Faster mixed IO speed.
+19%
334 MB/s
4K Mixed
Avg. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
48.3 MB/s Slightly faster random mixed IO.
+10%
44.1 MB/s
SusWrite
Avg. Sustained Write Speed
388 MB/s Faster sustained write speed.
+12%
346 MB/s
Read
Peak Sequential Read Speed
515 MB/s 515 MB/s
Write
Peak Sequential Write Speed
488 MB/s 488 MB/s
4K Read
Peak 4K Random Read Speed
45.9 MB/s Slightly faster peak random read.
+5%
43.6 MB/s
4K Write
Peak 4K Random Write Speed
128 MB/s +2% 125 MB/s
Mixed
Peak Sequential Mixed IO Speed
448 MB/s Faster peak mixed IO speed.
+17%
383 MB/s
4K Mixed
Peak 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
61 MB/s Slightly faster peak random mixed IO.
+8%
56.7 MB/s
SusWrite
Peak Sequential Sustained Write 60s Average
487 MB/s +1% 484 MB/s
Market Share
Based on 77,609,672 SSDs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.01 % 0.08 % Hugely higher market share.
+700%
Value
Value For Money
15.5 % Better value.
+25%
12.5 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
52 % 54 % +4%
Price
Price (score)
$90 Cheaper.
+18%
$110
Age
Newest
81 Months Much more recent.
+35%
124 Months
DQ Read
Peak 4K-64Thread Read Speed
389 MB/s +0% 388 MB/s
DQ Write
Peak 4K-64Thread Write Speed
361 MB/s 361 MB/s
AS-SSD Total
AS-SSD Total Score
1,289 Pts +1% 1,280 Pts
DQ Mixed
Peak 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
367 MB/s +3% 356 MB/s
ADQ Read
Avg. 4K-64Thread Read Speed
343 MB/s 344 MB/s +0%
ADQ Write
Avg. 4K-64Thread Write Speed
296 MB/s +5% 282 MB/s
ADQ Mixed
Avg. 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
309 MB/s +5% 295 MB/s
Capacity
Capacity
256GB 256GB

The 860 Pro is Samsung’s latest consumer-grade SATA SSD flagship, superseding the popular, but now three years old, 850 Pro. Like the 850 Pro, the 860 Pro is based on Samsung’s proprietary and revolutionary (at the time), MLC V-NAND (3D). A 10% price premium over the 256 GB 850 Pro will purchase the 256 GB 860 Pro which has an impressive 16% faster effective speed. This is achieved via an updated controller (MJX) and 64 layers of V-NAND (versus 32 layers per the 850 Pro). The 860 Pro has sequential speeds of up to 540 MB/s which almost completely saturate its SATA 3.0 interface. These peak levels of performance are slightly higher, but still comparable to the peak performance of the 860 Evo before its SLC write cache (12 GB on the 250 GB Evo) is saturated, making the 860 Evo (at around 30% cheaper) a more economical choice for users who rarely write more than 12 GB at a time. There are also reliability improvements compared to the 850 generation with Samsung now offering a warranty of 300 TBW (terabytes written) for the 256 GB 860 Pro, compared to 150 TBW for the 256 GB 850 Pro. Thanks to higher density NAND, the 860 Pro is also available in a 4 TB variant, whereas previously 2 TB was the largest capacity for a Samsung SATA MLC SSD.  [Feb '18 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

The 256GB Samsung 850 Pro is the fastest consumer SSD we have seen to date. Thanks to Samsung's new 3D V-NAND the 850 Pro has lower power consumption and better performance, albeit marginally, than both the 840 Evo and 840 Pro. Looking at the benchmark figures for the 840 and 850 Pros shows that the effective performance improvement is 10% whereas the 850 Pro beats the 840 Evo by 16%. These drives effectively saturate SATA 3.0 making it difficult to distinguish between them in day-to-day use. At current prices the 850 Pro is prohibitively expensive, prices need to drop by 15% before it approaches the 840 Pro from a value perspective. Samsung may release a value orientated 850 Evo soon, but for now "most" users are better off with the 840 Pro. [Oct '14 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

Solid State Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 SSD Rankings

Welcome to our SSD comparison. We calculate effective speed for both SATA and NVMe drives based on real world performance then adjust by current prices per GB to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top SSDs. [SSDrivePro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your SSD? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback