Today's hottest deals
SamsungMZ-77E4T0B
CrucialCT250MX500SSD1

Controller: Samsung MKX. Memory: Samsung 128 layer TLC V-NAND. Release date ≈ Q1 2021.

Controller: Silicon Motion SM2258. Flash Memory: Micron 3D TLC. Release date: Q4 2017.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 86,631 user samples
9,454 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 137% 3.5TB free
Worst Bench: 90% 1.5TB free
Poor: 90% Great: 137%
SPEED RANK: 203rd / 1080
77,177 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 123% 74GB free
Worst Bench: 73% 64GB free (System drive)
Poor: 73% Great: 123%
SPEED RANK: 260th / 1080
Effective Speed
Effective SSD Speed
117 % Faster effective speed.
+15%
101 %
Read
Avg. Sequential Read Speed
481 MB/s Slightly faster read speed.
+7%
451 MB/s
Write
Avg. Sequential Write Speed
451 MB/s Faster write speed.
+14%
394 MB/s
4K Read
Avg. 4K Random Read Speed
40.5 MB/s Faster random read.
+20%
33.7 MB/s
4K Write
Avg. 4K Random Write Speed
90 MB/s Slightly faster random write.
+8%
83.4 MB/s
Mixed
Avg. Sequential Mixed IO Speed
426 MB/s Faster mixed IO speed.
+10%
386 MB/s
4K Mixed
Avg. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
53.6 MB/s Faster random mixed IO.
+18%
45.4 MB/s
SusWrite
Avg. Sustained Write Speed
445 MB/s Faster sustained write speed.
+26%
352 MB/s
Read
Peak Sequential Read Speed
517 MB/s +1% 514 MB/s
Write
Peak Sequential Write Speed
491 MB/s Slightly faster peak write speed.
+5%
466 MB/s
4K Read
Peak 4K Random Read Speed
48.8 MB/s Faster peak random read.
+15%
42.6 MB/s
4K Write
Peak 4K Random Write Speed
131 MB/s Faster peak random write.
+13%
116 MB/s
Mixed
Peak Sequential Mixed IO Speed
464 MB/s +3% 450 MB/s
4K Mixed
Peak 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
68.1 MB/s Faster peak random mixed IO.
+17%
58.3 MB/s
SusWrite
Peak Sequential Sustained Write 60s Average
489 MB/s Slightly faster peak sustained write speed.
+7%
458 MB/s
Market Share
Based on 77,530,755 SSDs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0.04 % 0.04 %
Value
Value For Money
54.2 % Hugely better value.
+109%
26 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
51 % 56 % Slightly more popular.
+10%
Price
Price (score)
$290 $40 Hugely cheaper.
+86%
Age
Newest
45+ Months Much more recent.
+45%
82 Months
DQ Read
Peak 4K-64Thread Read Speed
389 MB/s +1% 384 MB/s
DQ Write
Peak 4K-64Thread Write Speed
364 MB/s +1% 359 MB/s
AS-SSD Total
AS-SSD Total Score
1,301 Pts +3% 1,258 Pts
DQ Mixed
Peak 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
374 MB/s Much faster peak deep queue mixed IO.
+35%
278 MB/s
ADQ Read
Avg. 4K-64Thread Read Speed
354 MB/s Slightly faster deep queue read.
+8%
329 MB/s
ADQ Write
Avg. 4K-64Thread Write Speed
305 MB/s +4% 294 MB/s
ADQ Mixed
Avg. 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
324 MB/s Much faster deep queue mixed IO.
+48%
219 MB/s
Capacity
Capacity
4TB 250GB

There are high failure rates for the 4TB version of this drive. After moderate use the drive can develop bad sectors which block file reads. Scandisk does not detect the errors and the data blocks are not recoverable. There are widespread reports of this problem but Samsung have yet to issue a statement. [Jul '23 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

The MX500 is Crucial’s current flagship consumer SATA SSD featuring their latest second generation 64-layer 3D TLC NAND. It’s available in 250 GB, 500 GB, 1 TB and 2 TB capacities in a 2.5-inch form factor. All but the 2 TB version will also be available in M.2 (2280) form in the future. The MX500 features a Silicon Motion SM2258 controller which is a change from the Marvell 88SS1074 controller featured in the MX300 (it’s nearly two year old predecessor). Performance is around 30% better than on the MX300 which currently retails at the same price. The MX500 has an SLC cache which increases with drive capacity. Consequently, the larger capacities are better able to sustain high sequential write speeds. The 250 GB version has 250MB of SLC cache, the 500 GB has 512 MB, the 1 TB has 1 GB and the 2 TB has 2 GB. Extended sustained write performance tests show that even though speed does drop off after the cache has been exhausted, it is still maintained at very respectable levels. The MX500’s five year warranty is in line with Samsung’s 850 Evo and exceeds it in terms of endurance (just 75 TBW for the 250 GB 850 Evo versus 100 TBW for the 250 GB MX500). It doesn’t quite match up to the Samsung’s 850 Evo’s performance (effective speed 8% slower), however at current prices it is about 20% cheaper, and on balance offers better value for money. [Mar '18 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

Solid State Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 SSD Rankings

Welcome to our SSD comparison. We calculate effective speed for both SATA and NVMe drives based on real world performance then adjust by current prices per GB to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top SSDs. [SSDrivePro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your SSD? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback