SeagateST120HM000
IntelSSDSC2BP240G410

Controller: LAMD LM87800. Flash Memory: Toshiba 19nm MLC. Release date: Q2 2013.

Controller: Intel 29F32B08MCMF2. Flash Memory: Intel 20nm MLC. Release date: Q1 2014.

Real World Speed
Performance profile from 9,072 user samples
655 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 90% 86GB free
Worst Bench: 54% 15GB free (System drive)
Poor: 54% Great: 90%
SPEED RANK: 565th / 1074
8,417 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 95% 50GB free
Worst Bench: 67% 198GB free (System drive)
Poor: 67% Great: 95%
SPEED RANK: 424th / 1074
Effective Speed
Effective SSD Speed
75.6 % 83.9 % Faster effective speed.
+11%
Read
Avg. Sequential Read Speed
438 MB/s Faster read speed.
+17%
374 MB/s
Write
Avg. Sequential Write Speed
258 MB/s 275 MB/s Slightly faster write speed.
+7%
4K Read
Avg. 4K Random Read Speed
23.1 MB/s 30.6 MB/s Much faster random read.
+32%
4K Write
Avg. 4K Random Write Speed
71 MB/s 86.3 MB/s Faster random write.
+22%
Mixed
Avg. Sequential Mixed IO Speed
251 MB/s 257 MB/s +2%
4K Mixed
Avg. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
28.4 MB/s 32.8 MB/s Faster random mixed IO.
+15%
SusWrite
Avg. Sustained Write Speed
211 MB/s 255 MB/s Faster sustained write speed.
+21%
Read
Peak Sequential Read Speed
492 MB/s Faster peak read speed.
+20%
409 MB/s
Write
Peak Sequential Write Speed
301 MB/s +3% 292 MB/s
4K Read
Peak 4K Random Read Speed
28.4 MB/s 35.3 MB/s Faster peak random read.
+24%
4K Write
Peak 4K Random Write Speed
103 MB/s 113 MB/s Slightly faster peak random write.
+10%
Mixed
Peak Sequential Mixed IO Speed
283 MB/s +2% 278 MB/s
4K Mixed
Peak 4K Random Mixed IO Speed
34.1 MB/s 37.4 MB/s Slightly faster peak random mixed IO.
+10%
SusWrite
Peak Sequential Sustained Write 60s Average
294 MB/s +2% 289 MB/s
Market Share
Based on 76,091,245 SSDs tested
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days)
0 % 0.01 % Insanely higher market share.
+∞%
Value
Value For Money
5.34 % +1% 5.29 %
User Rating
UBM User Rating
51 % 53 % +4%
Price
Price (score)
$108 Much cheaper.
+57%
$250
Age
Newest
133 Months 124 Months Slightly more recent.
+7%
DQ Read
Peak 4K-64Thread Read Speed
358 MB/s 370 MB/s +3%
DQ Write
Peak 4K-64Thread Write Speed
302 MB/s Slightly faster peak deep queue write.
+8%
279 MB/s
AS-SSD Total
AS-SSD Total Score
1,093 Pts 1,102 Pts +1%
DQ Mixed
Peak 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
239 MB/s 277 MB/s Faster peak deep queue mixed IO.
+16%
ADQ Read
Avg. 4K-64Thread Read Speed
297 MB/s 323 MB/s Slightly faster deep queue read.
+9%
ADQ Write
Avg. 4K-64Thread Write Speed
236 MB/s 247 MB/s +5%
ADQ Mixed
Avg. 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed
197 MB/s 249 MB/s Faster deep queue mixed IO.
+26%
Capacity
Capacity
120GB 240GB
ADVERTISEMENT

The 120GB Seagate 600 is yet another drive that massively underperforms its larger, in this case 240GB, sibling. Looking at the 120GB and 240GB 600's shows that the larger 240GB version has peak speeds that are nearly 50% higher than the smaller 120GB. This increase in speed is down to additional NAND modules on the larger version which allow more parallelization during writes. The 120GB 600 has peak sequential read/write speeds of 508/246 MB/s which is great for reading but terrible for writing. The 600 does have reasonable deep queue performance but that doesn't make up for its relative inability to write. Overall the 120GB Seagate 600 is both slower and more expensive than the group leaders[Feb '14 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

The 240GB Intel 730 is just two months old and the newest SSDs in our group test. The 730 uses Intel's own enterprise controller (rather than a Sandforce) and it's marketed by Intel as an enthusiast class drive with data centre reliability. Backed by a 50GB per day, five year warranty the 730 has the most generous warranty I have seen on a consumer SSD. Unfortunately when it comes to performance the 730 is seriously let down by its relatively feeble peak sequential write speed of just 286 MB/s. The 730 scored an effective speed of just 439 MB/s which is 17% below the average of the ten group leaders. I seriously doubt that Intel will sell many of these drives at their current price point which is 25% higher than the average of the leading 240GB SSDs. [Mar '14 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

Solid State Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) June 2024 SSD Rankings

Welcome to our 2.5" and M.2 SSD comparison. We calculate effective speed for both SATA and NVMe drives based on real world performance then adjust by current prices per GB to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top SSDs. [SSDrivePro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your SSD? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback