COMPARE
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
SSD
RANKINGS
TEST
YOUR SSD
ADD TO PC
BUILD
ToshibaHDTS225EZSTA HDTS225XZSTA
$225
CrucialCT250MX500SSD1
▲ 511,258 ▼
 $225 

Controller: Toshiba TC58NC5HA9GST. NAND Memory: Toshiba Asynchronous 19mn MLC. Release date: Q2 2013.

VS
▲ 56654 ▼

Controller: Silicon Motion SM2258. Flash Memory: Micron 3D TLC. Release date: Q4 2017.

Effective Speed 
+24%
Real World Speed
Performance profile from 80,400 user samples
Benchmark your SSD here
3,223 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 106% 170GB free
Worst Bench: 55% 44GB free (System drive)
Poor: 55% Great: 106%
SPEED RANK: 468th / 1080
77,177 User Benchmarks
Best Bench: 123% 74GB free
Worst Bench: 73% 64GB free (System drive)
Poor: 73% Great: 123%
SPEED RANK: 260th / 1080
Effective Speed
Effective SSD Speed 		81.7 % 101 % Faster effective speed.
+24%
Average Score 
+25%
Read
Avg. Sequential Read Speed 		435 MB/s 451 MB/s +4%
Write
Avg. Sequential Write Speed 		340 MB/s 394 MB/s Faster write speed.
+16%
4K Read
Avg. 4K Random Read Speed 		20.5 MB/s 33.7 MB/s Much faster random read.
+64%
4K Write
Avg. 4K Random Write Speed 		65.8 MB/s 83.4 MB/s Faster random write.
+27%
Mixed
Avg. Sequential Mixed IO Speed 		361 MB/s 386 MB/s Slightly faster mixed IO speed.
+7%
4K Mixed
Avg. 4K Random Mixed IO Speed 		34.3 MB/s 45.4 MB/s Much faster random mixed IO.
+32%
SusWrite
Avg. Sustained Write Speed 		286 MB/s 352 MB/s Faster sustained write speed.
+23%
Peak Score 
+16%
Read
Peak Sequential Read Speed 		500 MB/s 514 MB/s +3%
Write
Peak Sequential Write Speed 		466 MB/s 466 MB/s
4K Read
Peak 4K Random Read Speed 		26.3 MB/s 42.6 MB/s Much faster peak random read.
+62%
4K Write
Peak 4K Random Write Speed 		101 MB/s 116 MB/s Faster peak random write.
+15%
Mixed
Peak Sequential Mixed IO Speed 		448 MB/s 450 MB/s +0%
4K Mixed
Peak 4K Random Mixed IO Speed 		45.5 MB/s 58.3 MB/s Faster peak random mixed IO.
+28%
SusWrite
Peak Sequential Sustained Write 60s Average 		456 MB/s 458 MB/s +0%
Value & Sentiment 
+384%
Market Share
Based on 77,588,870 SSDs tested
See market share leaders
Market Share
Market Share (trailing 30 days) 		0.01 % 0.12 % Insanely higher market share.
+1,100%
Value
Value For Money 		5.86 % 26 % Hugely better value.
+343%
User Rating
UBM User Rating 		51 % 56 % Slightly more popular.
+10%
Price
Price (score) 		$225 $40 Hugely cheaper.
+82%
Nice To Haves 
+5%
Age
Newest 		138 Months 83 Months Much more recent.
+40%
DQ Read
Peak 4K-64Thread Read Speed 		367 MB/s 384 MB/s +5%
DQ Write
Peak 4K-64Thread Write Speed 		332 MB/s 359 MB/s Slightly faster peak deep queue write.
+8%
AS-SSD Total
AS-SSD Total Score 		1,156 Pts 1,258 Pts Slightly stronger server IO.
+9%
DQ Mixed
Peak 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed 		352 MB/s Faster peak deep queue mixed IO.
+27% 		278 MB/s
ADQ Read
Avg. 4K-64Thread Read Speed 		320 MB/s 329 MB/s +3%
ADQ Write
Avg. 4K-64Thread Write Speed 		237 MB/s 294 MB/s Faster deep queue write.
+24%
ADQ Mixed
Avg. 4K-64Thread Mixed IO Speed 		262 MB/s Faster deep queue mixed IO.
+20% 		219 MB/s
Specifications 
Capacity
Capacity 		256GB 250GB
Conclusion 
Average Bench 81.7%
Average Bench 101%

The Toshiba HG5d is a reasonable SSD. Considering that Toshiba is amongst the few manufacturers that produce both their own NAND flash and SSD controllers, the HG5d is a little disappointing. With a Real World Speed of 444 MBps the Q Series lies just above the 50th percentile. Relative performance is better for server orientated workloads where the HG5d scored an AS SSD Total score of 970 points putting it in 11th position and at the 66th percentile, additionally the HG5d demonstrated very strong mixed 4K transfer rates peaking at 51.1 MB/s, the second highest seen to date on a 256GB SSD. The Toshiba HG5d is not a bad SSD but neither is it cutting edge which given it's relative youth counts strongly against it. Overall there are both faster and cheaper deals to be had elsewhere. [Sep '13 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

The MX500 is Crucial’s current flagship consumer SATA SSD featuring their latest second generation 64-layer 3D TLC NAND. It’s available in 250 GB, 500 GB, 1 TB and 2 TB capacities in a 2.5-inch form factor. All but the 2 TB version will also be available in M.2 (2280) form in the future. The MX500 features a Silicon Motion SM2258 controller which is a change from the Marvell 88SS1074 controller featured in the MX300 (it’s nearly two year old predecessor). Performance is around 30% better than on the MX300 which currently retails at the same price. The MX500 has an SLC cache which increases with drive capacity. Consequently, the larger capacities are better able to sustain high sequential write speeds. The 250 GB version has 250MB of SLC cache, the 500 GB has 512 MB, the 1 TB has 1 GB and the 2 TB has 2 GB. Extended sustained write performance tests show that even though speed does drop off after the cache has been exhausted, it is still maintained at very respectable levels. The MX500’s five year warranty is in line with Samsung’s 850 Evo and exceeds it in terms of endurance (just 75 TBW for the 250 GB 850 Evo versus 100 TBW for the 250 GB MX500). It doesn’t quite match up to the Samsung’s 850 Evo’s performance (effective speed 8% slower), however at current prices it is about 20% cheaper, and on balance offers better value for money. [Mar '18 SSDrivePro]

MORE DETAILS

User Builds 
3,223
77,177
Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Solid State Drive Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2024 SSD Rankings

Welcome to our SSD comparison. We calculate effective speed for both SATA and NVMe drives based on real world performance then adjust by current prices per GB to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top SSDs. [SSDrivePro]

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.
How Fast Is Your SSD? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware

 Frequently Asked Questions

Storage Devices FAQ
What is sustained sequential write speed?
What’s the difference between SLC, MLC and TLC?
What is 3D XPoint and how fast is it?
What’s the difference between SATA, PCIe and NVMe?
What’s the difference between NAND and V-NAND?
What is sequential write speed?
What is sequential read speed?
What is incompressible data?
What is queue depth?
Solid State Drives
What is the SSD value for money rating?
What is 4K 64 thread write speed?
Can CPU power saving states (C1,C2,C3) impact SSD speed?
What is the effective SSD speed index?
How is the AS SSD write score calculated?
How is the AS SSD read score calculated?
How is the AS SSD total score calculated?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback