Samsung 355V4C/356V4C/3445VC/3545VC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 73% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemSamsung 355V4C/356V4C/3445VC/3545VC  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP365E5C-S02UB
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130704
Uptime22.8 Days
Run DateAug 03 '18 at 00:52
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%
CPU Throttled 73%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-4500M APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Memory 54.7
1-Core 22.7
2-Core 42.7
28% 40 Pts
4-Core 47.5
8-Core 62.4
7% 55 Pts
64-Core 62.5
4% 62.5 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7640G
Sanyo(144D C0DD) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
4.02% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 7.31
Parallax 4
4% 5.24 fps
MRender 5.38
Gravity 3.43
Splatting 8.09
5% 5.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.02%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 112 89 98 102 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
50.2% Above average
Read 412
Write 319
Mixed 240
SusWrite 107
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 27
4K Mixed 23.4
73% 23 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 79.3
DQ Mixed 73.4
61% 88.2 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G3N18AES4.16FE BLS4G3N18AES4.16FE 8GB
933, 933 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
26.4% Poor
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 5.5
MC Mixed 10.5
27% 9.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 7
16% 5.7 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 355V4C/356V4C/3445VC/3545VC Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 355V4C/356V4C/3445VC/3545VC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $27
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback