Lenovo 80XL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive35% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80XL  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20171204
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 08 '18 at 21:50
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.4% Good
Memory 86.6
1-Core 58.1
2-Core 128
56% 90.9 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 208
28% 210 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia 940MX
Legend(17AA 38E2) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9836
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
8.01% Terrible
Lighting 9.57
Reflection 7.31
Parallax 7.91
8% 8.26 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 10.6
Splatting 8.48
8% 10.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.01%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hfs128g3 BTND-N210A 128GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 118 101 99 102 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
35% Below average
Read 315
Write 98.8
Mixed 93.5
SusWrite 103
33% 152 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 8.3
4K Mixed 12.6
40% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 8.4
DQ Mixed 15.7
27% 58 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35%
Great: 71%
ASMT 2115 1TB
583GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 37 38 38 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
23.3% Poor
Read 36.5
Write 35.8
Mixed 30
SusWrite 38
48% 35.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 167%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
62.9% Good
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 24.3
MC Mixed 20
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 25
SC Mixed 19.5
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80XL Builds (Compare 1,872 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80XL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback