TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX1320 M3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemFujitsu PRIMERGY TX1320 M3  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3373-B1
Memory22.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20170330
Uptime129.7 Days
Run DateAug 17 '18 at 10:35
Run Duration283 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v6
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
66.9% Good
Memory 64
1-Core 50.9
2-Core 105
45% 73.4 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 411
54% 406 Pts
64-Core 423
26% 423 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑
This bench: 66.9%
 Great: 83%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
FTS PRAID EP400i 240GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.66
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 2,809
Write 3356
Mixed 3,157
698% 3,107 MB/s
4K Read 88.6
4K Write 86.9
4K Mixed 79.7
282% 85.1 MB/s
DQ Read 486
DQ Write 450
DQ Mixed 446
341% 461 MB/s
FTS PRAID EP400i 1TB
1TB free
Firmware: 4.66
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 363 358 365 366 362 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
259% Outstanding
Read 3,025
Write 3,204
Mixed 3,164
SusWrite 372
548% 2,441 MB/s
4K Read 88.5
4K Write 95.3
4K Mixed 91
301% 91.6 MB/s
DQ Read 490
DQ Write 467
DQ Mixed 461
351% 472 MB/s
Poor: 259% ↑
This bench: 259%
 Great: 298%
WD My Passport 259F 500GB
291GB free, PID 259f
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 40 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
20.8% Poor
Read 38.7
Write 34.2
Mixed 28.3
SusWrite 39.3
47% 35.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑
This bench: 20.8%
 Great: 47%
TANDBERG RDX 500GB
388GB free, PID 0005
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 105 106 105 106 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 82.7
Write 92.5
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 106
108% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑
This bench: 40.7%
 Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391A1K43BB1-CRC M391A1K43BB1-CRC Hynix HMA81GU7AFR8N-UH Hynix HMA81GU7AFR8N-UH 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.3% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 32.7
MC Mixed 27.9
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 15.1
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $164
Intel Core i5-12400F $117Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $393
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback