ADD TO PC
BUILD

Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX1320 M3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	93.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX1320 M3 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3373-B1
Memory	26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190425
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 22 '21 at 11:57
Run Duration	213 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1230 v6 474 User benchmarks, average bench 79% CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	81.6% Excellent	Memory 83.5 1-Core 123 2-Core 236 82% 148 Pts	4-Core 430 8-Core 655 67% 542 Pts	64-Core 650 40% 650 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
FTS PRAID EP400i 500GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 318GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4.68 SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 303 297 298 297 298 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	93.2% Outstanding	Read 405 Write 381 Mixed 385 SusWrite 301 83% 368 MB/s	4K Read 33.6 4K Write 77.1 4K Mixed 42.2 146% 51 MB/s	DQ Read 340 DQ Write 260 DQ Mixed 293 221% 298 MB/s
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 93.2% Great: 93%
FTS PRAID EP400i 1TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 278% 989GB free Firmware: 4.68 SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 203 197 201 203 197 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	298% Outstanding	Read 3,362 Write 4142 Mixed 3,877 SusWrite 210 651% 2,898 MB/s	4K Read 128 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 123 412% 122 MB/s	DQ Read 499 DQ Write 496 DQ Mixed 439 346% 478 MB/s
Poor: 259% ↑ This bench: 298% Great: 298%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$88 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 118GB free Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1284 295 294 293 293 292 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	180% Outstanding	Read 1,063 Write 1,245 Mixed 487 SusWrite 458 182% 813 MB/s	4K Read 36.2 4K Write 158 4K Mixed 48.3 200% 80.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,048 DQ Write 1,145 DQ Mixed 766 668% 987 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 180% Great: 236%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA82GU7AFR8N-UH 2x16GB 74 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	82.1% Excellent	MC Read 29.8 MC Write 31.8 MC Mixed 25.8 83% 29.1 GB/s	SC Read 18.8 SC Write 34.2 SC Mixed 25.5 75% 26.2 GB/s	Latency 74.3 54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $423

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback