Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics45% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A78M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 13 '18 at 09:06
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5600K APU-$250
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 81.7
1-Core 68.1
2-Core 122
56% 90.6 Pts
4-Core 213
8-Core 208
28% 210 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 1380 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
45% Average
Lighting 57.4
Reflection 60.3
Parallax 72.8
47% 63.5 fps
MRender 53
Gravity 53.3
Splatting 47.8
42% 51.4 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 45%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB-$86
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 176 169 160 117 162 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 454
Write 393
Mixed 263
SusWrite 164
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 61.1
4K Mixed 32
113% 39.8 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 215
169% 232 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 100%
Hitachi HDS721010DLE630 1TB-$150
698GB free
Firmware: MS2OA610
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 142 95 89 145 173 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 174
Write 92.7
Mixed 11
SusWrite 135
74% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0
33% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TMS4GB364E081 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.9% Below average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 12.2
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 11.8
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A78M-D3H Builds (Compare 127 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-D3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $124
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback