MSI MS-16F4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics21.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GT60 2PC
MotherboardMSI MS-16F4  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140113
Uptime8.9 Days
Run DateSep 21 '18 at 21:27
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4800MQ-$150
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Memory 51.1
1-Core 67.1
2-Core 169
51% 95.7 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 413
44% 350 Pts
64-Core 454
28% 454 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 870M
MSI(1462 1106) 3GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9882
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Lighting 25.1
Reflection 23.4
Parallax 34.4
20% 27.6 fps
MRender 30.3
Gravity 32.8
Splatting 23.2
23% 28.8 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 24%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
225GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 52 57 63 58 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 46.5
Write 73.5
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 60.7
37% 50.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
66% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI16D3LS1KBG/8G MSI16D3LS1KBG/4G 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
29.3% Poor
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 9.4
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 6.5
21% 7.3 GB/s
Latency 157
26% 157 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16F4 Builds (Compare 159 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16F4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $289
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $251WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback