MSI MS-16H2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
8 years ago, 8 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-16H2  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star MS-16H2
Memory9.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150129
Uptime19.7 Days
Run DateMar 29 '16 at 00:43
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 96.4
2-Core 192
71% 124 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 505
55% 438 Pts
64-Core 504
31% 504 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
MSI(1462 1102) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4331
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.97% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 6.96
Parallax 7.16
3% 6.07 fps
MRender 7.76
Gravity 2.43
Splatting 8.17
5% 6.12 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.97%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HG6 SATA M.2 128GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JUXA0102 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Read 493
Write 416
Mixed 492
104% 467 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 35.1
99% 34.8 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 169
157% 245 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 98%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$45
6GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 72.7
Write 69.5
Mixed 71.7
54% 71.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.97
4K Mixed 0.29
91% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI16D3LS1KBG/8G MSI16D3LS1KBG/4G 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
54.9% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 16.8
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.5
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16H2 Builds (Compare 155 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: MSI MS-16H2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $251WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback