Asus P8B75-M LX PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M LX PLUS  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140806
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 23 '18 at 10:34
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 95.8
1-Core 107
2-Core 213
80% 138 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 519
53% 430 Pts
64-Core 520
32% 520 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
PwrHis(1787 2320) 2GB
CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.9.2
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Lighting 25.7
Reflection 27.7
Parallax 31
21% 28.1 fps
MRender 24.6
Gravity 20.6
Splatting 32.8
22% 26 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X31000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 216 207 208 198 193 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 475
Write 434
Mixed 299
SusWrite 224
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 42.5
4K Mixed 29.7
102% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 304
DQ Mixed 259
213% 305 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 101%
Samsung HD103SI 1TB-$89
457GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 84 85 82 85 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
48% Average
Read 83.4
Write 87
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 83.9
55% 74.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48%
Great: 59%
Toshiba MD04ACA50D 5TB
3GB free
Firmware: FS2A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 133
Write 132
Mixed 58.9
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.2
256% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 108%
Toshiba MD04ACA600 6TB-$250
4.5TB free
Firmware: FS2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 193 193 196 197 194 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 188
Mixed 72.4
SusWrite 195
117% 161 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
509% 3.83 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 111%
Great: 112%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
60GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 86 86 87 89 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 64.4
Write 65.5
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 87.2
44% 60.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
81% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 67%
ST3000DM 008-2DM166 3TB
956GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0 0 0.1 0 2.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
28.2% Poor
Read 157
Write 129
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 0.5
110% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 57%
ST310003 40AS 1TB
29GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 51 52 51 51 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 23.5
Write 14.7
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 51.3
45% 31.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 41%
SAMSUNG HD203WI 2TB
1TB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 51 52 51 51 53 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
25.3% Poor
Read 63.9
Write 37.2
Mixed 49.8
SusWrite 52
66% 50.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 46%
WDC WD10 EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
3GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.1 0 0.1 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 42.3
Write 41.4
Mixed 31.6
SusWrite 0.1
36% 28.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 39%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 64GB-$72
11GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 205 202 193 196 192 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 240
Write 151
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 196
200% 160 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 9.8
4K Mixed 7.8
640% 9.6 MB/s
DQ Read 12.4
DQ Write 8
DQ Mixed 9.2
631% 9.87 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 110%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
60.4% Good
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 19.2
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 19.8
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 54.6
73% 54.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-M LX PLUS Builds (Compare 546 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M LX PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $146
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback