Supermicro SYS-1029P-MTR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive94.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro SYS-1029P-MTR  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X11DPL-i
Memory57.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171129
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 03 '18 at 12:14
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 4110
CPU1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Memory 62
1-Core 55.5
2-Core 123
47% 80 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 453
41% 343 Pts
64-Core 1,709
106% 1,709 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 1 Volume 487GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 319 327 322 319 325 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Read 1,037
Write 309
Mixed 306
SusWrite 321
108% 493 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 27.5
4K Mixed 25.9
80% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 182
138% 188 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 127%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 119 120 120 119 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 191
Write 120
Mixed 62
SusWrite 121
90% 124 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1.6
328% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 128%
Intel Raid 10 Volume 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 236 235 233 235 236 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 218
Write 222
Mixed 82.9
SusWrite 234
138% 189 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 2.2
772% 6.27 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 131%
Great: 239%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB
3GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 6.5 6.4 6.5 6.5 6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
2.93% Terrible
Read 6.7
Write 3
Mixed 5.3
SusWrite 6.3
7% 5.32 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
9% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.93%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 18ASF2G72PZ-2G6D1 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.9% Below average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 14.4
42% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.23 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback