Apple MacBookPro15,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemApple MacBookPro15,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-937A206F2EE63C01
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180906
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 03 '18 at 23:32
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 12%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Memory 89.8
1-Core 122
2-Core 235
84% 149 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 515
56% 442 Pts
64-Core 656
41% 656 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 86%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP1024 1TB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 177.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1396 1290 1158 1252 1352 1143 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 30%
Liteonit LCS-256L9S- 256GB
107GB free
Firmware: HC81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 233 234 234 214 234 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.9% Above average
Read 351
Write 322
Mixed 264
SusWrite 231
66% 292 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 26.4
4K Mixed 17.4
61% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 90.6
DQ Write 88.4
DQ Mixed 88.3
67% 89.1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 69%
ASMT 2105 1TB
155GB free, PID 5136
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 179 179 179 183 179 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 231
Write 220
Mixed 214
SusWrite 180
285% 211 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 19
4K Mixed 16.7
1,270% 16.9 MB/s
DQ Read 16.9
DQ Write 22.1
DQ Mixed 19.4
1,474% 19.5 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 135%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
76% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 21.5
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 32.2
SC Mixed 24.2
71% 24.7 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 76%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro15,1 Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: Apple MacBookPro15,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback