Gigabyte GA-H87-D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte H87-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H87-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150818
Uptime10.8 Days
Run DateJun 06 '20 at 18:26
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User SYC-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Memory 93.8
1-Core 87
2-Core 201
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 395
52% 389 Pts
64-Core 385
24% 385 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
EVGA(3842 3765) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
28.6% Poor
Lighting 33
Reflection 30.8
Parallax 38.8
27% 34.2 fps
MRender 42.8
Gravity 41.1
Splatting 34.7
32% 39.5 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S128G 126GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 181 170 56 68 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 390
Write 281
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 111
48% 216 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 7.9
4K Mixed 11.4
40% 11.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 56%
Liteonit LCS-256L9S- 256GB
116GB free
Firmware: HC81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 341 367 343 368 373 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.5% Good
Read 394
Write 362
Mixed 258
SusWrite 341
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 37.2
4K Mixed 22.3
83% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 114
94% 135 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 69%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
2TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 163 167 167 167 168 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 163
Mixed 99.5
SusWrite 164
112% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
214% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 100%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
307GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 127 130 131 130 130 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 104
Write 102
Mixed 76.7
SusWrite 128
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
207% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 100%
WD Red 10TB (2017)-$419
991GB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 176 184 184 178 180 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 138
Write 147
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 179
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 1.2
314% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
61.7% Good
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 20.1
61% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 18.5
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 60.3
66% 60.3 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H87-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 562 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H87-D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback