Today's hottest deals

MSI Z370 TOMAHAWK (MS-7B47)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics99.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive26.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B47
MotherboardMSI Z370 TOMAHAWK (MS-7B47)  (all builds)
Memory58.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210420
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 04 '21 at 23:37
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$385
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Memory 81.2
1-Core 140
2-Core 295
92% 172 Pts
4-Core 588
8-Core 956
95% 772 Pts
64-Core 1,515
94% 1,515 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
Zotac(19DA 2435) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 137
Parallax 139
103% 134 fps
MRender 94.8
Gravity 128
Splatting 115
93% 113 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston KC1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 960GB-$773
376GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E7FT04.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 138 139 139 135 149 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.9% Poor
Read 232
Write 52.3
Mixed 149
SusWrite 137
32% 143 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 3.4
33% 7.73 MB/s
Poor: 109%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 221%
WD Red 10TB (2017)-$419
3TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 114 117 117 116 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 87.4
Write 104
Mixed 31
SusWrite 116
61% 84.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.9
258% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST10000NE0004-1ZF101 10TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: EN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 194 194 195 196 196 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 55% Great: 131%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
70.8% Very good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 22.1
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 30.1
SC Mixed 21.1
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 78.3
51% 78.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 13: 1R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
13% 7% 68 301 221 240 24.1" 1920 1080 SAM100A LC27RG50
Typical Z370 TOMAHAWK (MS-7B47) Builds (Compare 2,372 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI Z370 TOMAHAWK (MS-7B47)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $479
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback