Today's hottest deals

Asus P8Z77-V DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130813
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 07 '18 at 05:10
Run Duration326 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$150
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 90.3
1-Core 118
2-Core 235
83% 148 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 586
60% 485 Pts
64-Core 586
36% 586 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
PNY(196E 119E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.16
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 153
Parallax 130
111% 140 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 137
Splatting 113
100% 123 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 181 185 172 179 181 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 387
Write 233
Mixed 273
SusWrite 180
60% 268 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 97.9
4K Mixed 37.7
146% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 304
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 244
189% 261 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$50
1TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 142 141 141 141 141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Read 148
Write 112
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 140
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 113%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$75
1TB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 81 79 82 81 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 122
Write 90
Mixed 62
SusWrite 80.1
65% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 96%
Hitachi HDN 726060ALE614 6TB
362GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 32
Write 30
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 13.3
19% 25.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 117%
Hitachi HDN 726060ALE614 6TB
611GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 32.3
Write 30
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 13.3
19% 25.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
158% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 117%
JMicron Generic DISK00 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 99
Write 99.5
Mixed 32
SusWrite 26.4
80% 64.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
99% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 73%
JMicron Generic DISK02 4TB
638GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
28% Poor
Read 108
Write 109
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 26.1
87% 70 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
102% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 28%
Great: 68%
JMicron Generic DISK01 4TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 102
Write 99.7
Mixed 18.8
SusWrite 26.1
75% 61.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
99% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 74%
JMicron Generic DISK03 4TB
626GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 121
Write 116
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 26.1
86% 71.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
106% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 53%
JMicron Generic DISK04 4TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Read 110
Write 111
Mixed 38
SusWrite 26.1
88% 71.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
103% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 64%
HGST HDN 724040ALE640 4TB
1TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 34 34 33 34 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
32% Below average
Read 122
Write 122
Mixed 53.2
SusWrite 33.8
104% 82.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
106% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32%
Great: 45%
HGST HDN 724040ALE640 4TB
2TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 34 34 33 34 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
25.2% Poor
Read 81
Write 78.5
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 34
64% 51.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
92% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 45%
HGST HDN 726040ALE614 4TB
222GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 34 34 33 34 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.1% Below average
Read 144
Write 151
Mixed 70.8
SusWrite 34
126% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
86% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 33%
HGST HDN 726040ALE614 4TB
1TB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 34 34 33 34 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.8% Below average
Read 153
Write 167
Mixed 73
SusWrite 34
136% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
92% 1.23 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
51% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.8
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 16.4
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 51%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z77-V DELUXE Builds (Compare 912 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V DELUXE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $430
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback