Today's hottest deals

Asus P6T

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P6T  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100921
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateOct 10 '18 at 03:54
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
59% Above average
Memory 95.8
1-Core 57.1
2-Core 97.9
56% 83.6 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 145
18% 138 Pts
64-Core 150
9% 150 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$90
CLim: 1463 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 411.63
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Lighting 25.6
Reflection 19
Parallax 22.4
21% 22.3 fps
MRender 27.2
Gravity 25.5
Splatting 19
19% 23.9 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,519
Write 1,028
Mixed 1,299
285% 1,282 MB/s
4K Read 92
4K Write 56.8
4K Mixed 42.5
224% 63.8 MB/s
DQ Read 403
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 425
305% 392 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Generic- SD/MMC/MS/MSPRO 64GB
6GB free, PID 0307
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 20 21 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
9.98% Terrible
Read 27.5
Write 12.2
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 19.8
24% 18.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 2.3
100% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.98%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
46% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 17.4
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 12.2
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 54.6
73% 54.6 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 46%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6T Builds (Compare 1,206 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6T

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $315
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback