Today's hottest deals

Asus B150M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics58.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus B150M-A  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1804 x 1026 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160125
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateOct 14 '18 at 15:08
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$127
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 89.6
1-Core 127
2-Core 237
86% 151 Pts
4-Core 403
8-Core 594
62% 499 Pts
64-Core 611
38% 611 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$144
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Lighting 72.8
Reflection 71.4
Parallax 61.3
59% 68.5 fps
MRender 70.1
Gravity 68.8
Splatting 71.5
58% 70.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175
330GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 261 261 132 114 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
81.1% Excellent
Read 434
Write 380
Mixed 315
SusWrite 207
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 73.2
4K Mixed 33.8
124% 44.8 MB/s
DQ Read 303
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 171
162% 253 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 92%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140
1.5TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 174 178 170 180 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Read 143
Write 152
Mixed 63.9
SusWrite 176
97% 134 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
319% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 104%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$95
531GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 113 119 120 123 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 29.1
Write 135
Mixed 30
SusWrite 118
57% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.3
77% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 107%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 3TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 44 44 44 44 45 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 170
Write 43.4
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 44.3
58% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 107%
External USB3.0 DISK00 4TB
110GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 6.5 3.9 4.1 3.4 3.8 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 170
Write 171
Mixed 79
SusWrite 4.6
130% 106 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
166% 5.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 77%
External USB3.0 DISK01 4TB
204GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 171 171 168 172 173 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 177
Write 180
Mixed 77.8
SusWrite 170
201% 151 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
164% 5.47 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 70%
External USB3.0 DISK02 4TB
338GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 6.5 3.7 4.2 3.3 5 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 150
Write 176
Mixed 79
SusWrite 4.8
129% 103 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
172% 5.67 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 66%
External USB3.0 DISK03 4TB
575GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 14 5.2 5.9 3.9 4.9 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 164
Write 170
Mixed 78.8
SusWrite 7.3
130% 105 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
157% 5.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 80%
External USB3.0 DISK04 3TB
417GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 166 171 167 171 173 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 118
Write 114
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 168
148% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
99% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905625-036.A00G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
72.6% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 23
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 22.4
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B150M-A Builds (Compare 1,299 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus B150M-A - $285

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $858
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback