Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 139%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 134%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics154% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201203
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateAug 12 '22 at 19:31
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$90
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Memory 83.8
1-Core 143
2-Core 282
92% 170 Pts
4-Core 519
8-Core 910
86% 715 Pts
64-Core 1,151
71% 1,151 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
154% Outstanding
Lighting 228
Reflection 208
Parallax 199
186% 212 fps
MRender 201
Gravity 154
Splatting 136
131% 164 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 154%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 478
Write 446
Mixed 385
97% 436 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 91
4K Mixed 52.9
180% 62 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
57GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,572
Write 2,386
Mixed 1,747
497% 2,235 MB/s
4K Read 65.9
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 91.5
306% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,410
DQ Write 1,145
DQ Mixed 1,266
951% 1,273 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
49GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 156 132 131 128 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Read 474
Write 442
Mixed 398
SusWrite 173
83% 372 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 95.5
4K Mixed 54.5
185% 64.2 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
140GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 139 153 154 155 155 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 158
Mixed 82.1
SusWrite 148
101% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
241% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 109%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$95
2.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 188 190 192 191 191 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 189
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 190
105% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
159% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 107%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3600 C17 Series 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 41.4
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 41.3
104% 36.5 GB/s
SC Read 28.8
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 41.7
93% 32.5 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 102%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS PRO Builds (Compare 2,009 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 182%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $776
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback