Medion Erazer P7647 MD60804

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	77.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 92% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Medion Erazer P7647 MD60804 (all builds)
Motherboard	MEDION D17KHN
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170510
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 19 '18 at 16:46
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	5%
CPU Throttled	92%

PC Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7200U 205,332 User benchmarks, average bench 45% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	65.1% Good	Memory 83.3 1-Core 94.5 2-Core 150 66% 109 Pts	4-Core 274 8-Core 272 36% 273 Pts	64-Core 271 17% 271 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950M 38,813 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Device(1B0A 2303) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8205 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Lighting 21.8 Reflection 15.9 Parallax 16.8 18% 18.2 fps	MRender 12.2 Gravity 21.6 Splatting 15.9 14% 16.6 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
S11-128G-PHISON-SSD-3D 128GB 38 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 59 59 60 60 60 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	77.5% Very good	Read 468 Write 347 Mixed 316 SusWrite 78.4 67% 302 MB/s	4K Read 34.8 4K Write 91.7 4K Mixed 31 141% 52.5 MB/s	DQ Read 215 DQ Write 310 DQ Mixed 172 155% 232 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 77.5% Great: 77%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100M 1TB 6,695 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 907GB free Firmware: AX1P1A SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 104 105 105 104 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Read 99.5 Write 99.1 Mixed 34.3 SusWrite 103 61% 84.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GS6DFR8A-PB 1x8GB 6,821 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	31.9% Below average	MC Read 10.9 MC Write 10.9 MC Mixed 9.3 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 9.9 SC Mixed 9.3 27% 9.6 GB/s	Latency 74.7 54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Medion Erazer P7647 MD60804

Performance Results

PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)