bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics19.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160405
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateOct 26 '18 at 16:02
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 75%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4
CPU #000, 2 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
39.8% Below average
Memory 54.5
1-Core 63.6
2-Core 150
50% 89.5 Pts
4-Core 144
8-Core 156
20% 150 Pts
64-Core 159
10% 159 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID M6-4Q
Nvidia(10DE 1183) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 370.12
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19.3% Very poor
Lighting 21.7
Reflection 25.2
Parallax 20.7
18% 22.5 fps
MRender 31.3
Gravity 21.3
Splatting 28.8
22% 27.1 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 19%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 69GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 194 193 203 204 164 MB/s
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.5% Average
Read 260
Write 211
Mixed 221
SusWrite 187
49% 220 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 10.6
4K Mixed 11.8
43% 12.3 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 205
DQ Mixed 228
173% 235 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 128 slots used
16GB DIMM DRAM
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
67.5% Good
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 30.2
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 11.8
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,565 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback