Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive97.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 26 '18 at 16:33
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 45%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Memory 95.7
1-Core 133
2-Core 260
92% 163 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 696
68% 555 Pts
64-Core 697
43% 697 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407
Gainward(10B0 1E87) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Lighting 179
Reflection 175
Parallax 187
146% 180 fps
MRender 189
Gravity 153
Splatting 112
120% 151 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 130%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 300 312 314 307 313 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 447
Write 325
Mixed 307
SusWrite 306
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 44
163% 63 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 307
DQ Mixed 149
139% 210 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 97%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
251GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 84 85 86 86 85 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 128
Write 126
Mixed 88.7
SusWrite 84.9
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 102 102 101 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 113
Write 102
Mixed 61
SusWrite 101
69% 94.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1632 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
56.2% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 16.6
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 16.2
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 54.8
73% 54.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,774 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $925
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback