Acer Predator G3600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Predator G3600  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator G3600
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110323
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 26 '22 at 16:12
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$195
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 88.9
1-Core 75.5
2-Core 192
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 465
52% 408 Pts
64-Core 463
29% 463 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 360B) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Lighting 32.4
Reflection 33.5
Parallax 40.9
26% 35.6 fps
MRender 42.5
Gravity 42.1
Splatting 34.4
32% 39.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 305 334 331 337 337 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 263
Write 333
Mixed 244
SusWrite 311
65% 288 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 69.8
4K Mixed 27.9
105% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 28.3
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 38.3
39% 59.6 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR512X64D3U13C9G 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
50.1% Above average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.8
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.1
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G3600 Builds (Compare 80 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Acer Predator G3600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $334
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback