Dell Precision M6800

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics15.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Precision M6800  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0F5HF3
Memory22.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140218
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 24 '14 at 19:56
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4930MX
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 68.5
2-Core 124
44% 96 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 310
32% 256 Pts
64-Core 372
23% 372 Pts
Poor: 38% Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4100M
Dell(1028 05CD) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4066
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Lighting 18
Reflection 17.3
Parallax 19.8
15% 18.4 fps
MRender 22.8
Gravity 17.8
Splatting 19.8
16% 20.1 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-512M6S 2.5 7mm 512GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC9110E Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 467
Write 390
Mixed 381
92% 413 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 2.44
4K Mixed 2.26
39% 9.16 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 102%
WDC WD10 01FALS-00J7B0 1TB
643GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.5% Below average
Read 90.6
Write 68.1
Mixed 44
80% 67.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.77
4K Mixed 0.35
74% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 34%
ST310003 40AS 1TB
30GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
22.3% Poor
Read 53.9
Write 50.6
Mixed 12.2
46% 38.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 1.07
4K Mixed 0.31
50% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 38%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 64GB-$72
1GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
89% Excellent
Read 191
Write 145
Mixed 79.1
162% 139 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 8.68
4K Mixed 4.57
497% 8.64 MB/s
DQ Read 14.2
DQ Write 8.87
DQ Mixed 5.01
525% 9.36 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 89%
Great: 111%
Typical Precision M6800 Builds (Compare 1,826 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision M6800

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $400
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback