Today's hottest deals

Asus P8P67 EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 EVO  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110302
Uptime8.4 Days
Run DateMay 30 '16 at 21:36
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 86.1
1-Core 88.4
2-Core 117
62% 97.1 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 355
46% 346 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
MSI(1462 2847) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5900
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Lighting 33.1
Reflection 30.2
Parallax 41.8
27% 35 fps
MRender 41.7
Gravity 30.3
Splatting 33.5
28% 35.2 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 5 Volume 5TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
88.9% Excellent
Read 1,128
Write 230
Mixed 332
121% 563 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 14.2
4K Mixed 17.6
60% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 115
122% 207 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 103%
Samsung SM843T 480GB
312GB free
Firmware: DXM87W3Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 319
Write 236
Mixed 267
61% 274 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 44.5
4K Mixed 29.1
89% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 86.2
80% 123 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 95%
Samsung SM843T 480GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM87W3Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 322
Write 201
Mixed 228
55% 250 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 45.2
4K Mixed 25.5
83% 29.4 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 83.7
77% 119 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 CMX8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
48% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 14.8
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 EVO Builds (Compare 614 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 EVO - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $666
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback